Work-in-Progress: Exploring Limited Preemption Approaches for the Phased Execution Model

Phased execution models separate computation from access to shared resources to make task execution predictable. These task models minimize interference between tasks, making them suitable for modern complex multi-core platforms. In the phased execution model, tasks perform computations only using the local memory to avoid accessing the shared memory during task execution. All instructions and data, including the intermediate results, are stored in the local memory during execution. Thus, the local memory size becomes a crucial factor in contrast to conventional execution. In the literature, non-preemptive and fully preemptive execution of phased execution models are studied. While the non-preemptive approaches utilize the local memory well, schedulability is reduced due to blocking. On the other hand, fully preemptive execution phases allow for better schedulability but require significantly more local memory capacity to implement preemptions at runtime without violating the model’s execution semantics. Thus, this work evaluates different approaches to limited preemptive scheduling of the phased execution model under partitioned fixed-priority scheduling. We demonstrate that preemption thresholds and non-preemptive regions can successfully be used to satisfy both timing and memory constraints of phased tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/rtss62706.2024.00048
Primary Topic
Simulation Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Work-in-Progress: Exploring Limited Preemption Approaches for the Phased Execution Model

Thilanka Thilakasiri, Matthias Becker
Simulation Techniques and Applications
article

Work-in-Progress: Exploring Limited Preemption Approaches for the Phased Execution Model

Thilanka Thilakasiri, Matthias Becker
article en

Abstract

Phased execution models separate computation from access to shared resources to make task execution predictable. These task models minimize interference between tasks, making them suitable for modern complex multi-core platforms. In the phased execution model, tasks perform computations only using the local memory to avoid accessing the shared memory during task execution. All instructions and data, including the intermediate results, are stored in the local memory during execution. Thus, the local memory size becomes a crucial factor in contrast to conventional execution. In the literature, non-preemptive and fully preemptive execution of phased execution models are studied. While the non-preemptive approaches utilize the local memory well, schedulability is reduced due to blocking. On the other hand, fully preemptive execution phases allow for better schedulability but require significantly more local memory capacity to implement preemptions at runtime without violating the model’s execution semantics. Thus, this work evaluates different approaches to limited preemptive scheduling of the phased execution model under partitioned fixed-priority scheduling. We demonstrate that preemption thresholds and non-preemptive regions can successfully be used to satisfy both timing and memory constraints of phased tasks.

KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Simulation Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.