Identification of Fraudulent Transactions for Enhanced Credit Card Fraud Detection

With the flourishment of the digital era and the evolution of new techniques and technology, this paper highlights the ever-growing risk of credit card fraud. The advancing technology has provided fraudsters with new and untraceable techniques for scamming genuine users. With the increasing impact of fraud, financial institutions must use machine learning tools for scam detection to provide safety and security to their users' accounts. This paper consists of an interdisciplinary comparative analysis of ML algorithms: Random Forest Classifier, XGBoost, ADABoost, Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, and Artificial Neural Networks. The diverse selection of algorithms aims to determine the most effective algorithm with the highest accuracy score for predicting legitimate and fraudulent transactions. The methodology involves fetching data from an Excel file, training the models, testing them on 20% of the dataset, and finally obtaining results in a Word document, having a confusion matrix and accuracy of each algorithm. By comparing the results of the confusion matrix and accuracy score, the Random Forest Classifier and XGBoost demonstrate the highest accuracy scores, while Logistic Regression yields a lower accuracy score.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictacs62700.2024.10840673
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of Fraudulent Transactions for Enhanced Credit Card Fraud Detection

Vijay Kumar, Surinder Kaur, Rachna Narula, Monica Gupta et al.
3 citations
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
1.04
article

Identification of Fraudulent Transactions for Enhanced Credit Card Fraud Detection

Vijay Kumar, Surinder Kaur, Rachna Narula, Monica Gupta, V. Gayathri, Neetu Singh
article en
3 citations

Abstract

With the flourishment of the digital era and the evolution of new techniques and technology, this paper highlights the ever-growing risk of credit card fraud. The advancing technology has provided fraudsters with new and untraceable techniques for scamming genuine users. With the increasing impact of fraud, financial institutions must use machine learning tools for scam detection to provide safety and security to their users' accounts. This paper consists of an interdisciplinary comparative analysis of ML algorithms: Random Forest Classifier, XGBoost, ADABoost, Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, and Artificial Neural Networks. The diverse selection of algorithms aims to determine the most effective algorithm with the highest accuracy score for predicting legitimate and fraudulent transactions. The methodology involves fetching data from an Excel file, training the models, testing them on 20% of the dataset, and finally obtaining results in a Word document, having a confusion matrix and accuracy of each algorithm. By comparing the results of the confusion matrix and accuracy score, the Random Forest Classifier and XGBoost demonstrate the highest accuracy scores, while Logistic Regression yields a lower accuracy score.

Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Identification of Fraudulent Transactions for Enhanced Credit Card Fraud Detection — Vijay Kumar, Surinder Kaur, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS