Benign or Toxic? Differences in Emoji Interpretation by Gender, Generation, and Emoji Type

Emoji usage, traditionally associated with playfulness and friendliness, has extended into toxic online behavior, encompassing both threatening emojis, such as the bomb 💣, and positive emojis, such as a smile 😊, used to intensify toxic content. This study investigates the extent to which different demographic groups perceive emoji use differently, including potentially toxic emoji use. Through an online survey, participants rated combinations of text and emoji on scales of friendliness, playfulness, sarcasm, passive-aggression, offensiveness, and threat. The findings reveal differences in emoji perception by gender, generation, and emoji type. Notably, non-binary individuals and Gen Z respondents perceived the emoji-containing messages as more sarcastic, passive-aggressive, and threatening. All groups reacted negatively to the bomb emoji and perceived the smiley face as friendly, but younger generations rated the smile and the thumbs up emojis as more passive-aggressive, while the fire and bomb emojis were rated more negatively by older generations. These findings have implications for the detection and moderation of toxic emoji use in online environments, as well as in legal contexts where emoji usage plays a role.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Internet
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14434/li.v22.40800
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benign or Toxic? Differences in Emoji Interpretation by Gender, Generation, and Emoji Type

Marina Zhukova, Susan C. Herring
4 citations
Language Internet
Digital Communication and Language
1.49
article

Benign or Toxic? Differences in Emoji Interpretation by Gender, Generation, and Emoji Type

Marina Zhukova, Susan C. Herring
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Emoji usage, traditionally associated with playfulness and friendliness, has extended into toxic online behavior, encompassing both threatening emojis, such as the bomb 💣, and positive emojis, such as a smile 😊, used to intensify toxic content. This study investigates the extent to which different demographic groups perceive emoji use differently, including potentially toxic emoji use. Through an online survey, participants rated combinations of text and emoji on scales of friendliness, playfulness, sarcasm, passive-aggression, offensiveness, and threat. The findings reveal differences in emoji perception by gender, generation, and emoji type. Notably, non-binary individuals and Gen Z respondents perceived the emoji-containing messages as more sarcastic, passive-aggressive, and threatening. All groups reacted negatively to the bomb emoji and perceived the smiley face as friendly, but younger generations rated the smile and the thumbs up emojis as more passive-aggressive, while the fire and bomb emojis were rated more negatively by older generations. These findings have implications for the detection and moderation of toxic emoji use in online environments, as well as in legal contexts where emoji usage plays a role.

Language InternetVol. 22(Special Issue)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Digital Communication and Language
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.