Neural pathway activation in the subthalamic region depends on stimulation polarity

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease; however, there is limited understanding of which subthalamic pathways are recruited in response to stimulation. Here, by focusing on the polarity of the stimulus waveform (cathodic versus anodic), our goal was to elucidate biophysical mechanisms that underlie electrical stimulation in the human brain. In clinical studies, cathodic stimulation more easily triggers behavioural responses, but anodic DBS broadens the therapeutic window. This suggests that neural pathways involved respond preferentially depending on stimulus polarity. To experimentally compare the activation of therapeutically relevant pathways during cathodic and anodic subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS, pathway activation was quantified by measuring evoked potentials resulting from antidromic or orthodromic activation in 15 Parkinson's disease patients undergoing DBS implantation. Cortical evoked potentials (cEPs) were recorded using subdural electrocorticography, DBS local evoked potentials (DLEPs) were recorded from non-stimulating contacts, and electromyography activity was recorded from arm and face muscles. We measured (i) the amplitude of short-latency cEP, previously demonstrated to reflect activation of the cortico-STN hyperdirect pathway, (ii) DLEP amplitude thought to reflect activation of STN-globus pallidus (GP) pathway and (iii) amplitudes of very short-latency cEPs and motor evoked potentials for activation of corticospinal/bulbar tract (CSBT). We constructed recruitment and strength-duration curves for each EP/pathway to compare the excitability for different stimulation polarities. We compared experimental data with the most advanced DBS computational models. Our results provide experimental evidence that subcortical cathodic and anodic stimulation activate the same pathways in the STN region and that cathodic stimulation is in general more efficient. However, relative efficiency varies for different pathways so that anodic stimulation is the least efficient in activating CSBT, more efficient in activating the hyperdirect pathway and as efficient as cathodic in activating STN-GP pathway. Our experiments confirm biophysical model predictions regarding neural activations in the central nervous system and provide evidence that stimulus polarity has differential effects on passing axons, terminal synapses, and local neurons. Comparison of experimental results with clinical DBS studies provides further evidence that the hyperdirect pathway may be involved in the therapeutic mechanisms of DBS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Communications
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf006
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural pathway activation in the subthalamic region depends on stimulation polarity

Roohollah Jafari Deligani, Enrico Opri, Faiçal Isbaine, Seyyed Bahram Borgheai et al.
11 citations
Brain Communications
Neurological disorders and treatments
4.06
article

Neural pathway activation in the subthalamic region depends on stimulation polarity

Roohollah Jafari Deligani, Enrico Opri, Faiçal Isbaine, Seyyed Bahram Borgheai, Benjamin B. Risk, Robert E. Gross, Nealen G. Laxpati, Eric R. Cole, Svjetlana Miocinovic, Nicholas Au Yong, Jon T. Willie, Cameron C. McIntyre
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease; however, there is limited understanding of which subthalamic pathways are recruited in response to stimulation. Here, by focusing on the polarity of the stimulus waveform (cathodic versus anodic), our goal was to elucidate biophysical mechanisms that underlie electrical stimulation in the human brain. In clinical studies, cathodic stimulation more easily triggers behavioural responses, but anodic DBS broadens the therapeutic window. This suggests that neural pathways involved respond preferentially depending on stimulus polarity. To experimentally compare the activation of therapeutically relevant pathways during cathodic and anodic subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS, pathway activation was quantified by measuring evoked potentials resulting from antidromic or orthodromic activation in 15 Parkinson's disease patients undergoing DBS implantation. Cortical evoked potentials (cEPs) were recorded using subdural electrocorticography, DBS local evoked potentials (DLEPs) were recorded from non-stimulating contacts, and electromyography activity was recorded from arm and face muscles. We measured (i) the amplitude of short-latency cEP, previously demonstrated to reflect activation of the cortico-STN hyperdirect pathway, (ii) DLEP amplitude thought to reflect activation of STN-globus pallidus (GP) pathway and (iii) amplitudes of very short-latency cEPs and motor evoked potentials for activation of corticospinal/bulbar tract (CSBT). We constructed recruitment and strength-duration curves for each EP/pathway to compare the excitability for different stimulation polarities. We compared experimental data with the most advanced DBS computational models. Our results provide experimental evidence that subcortical cathodic and anodic stimulation activate the same pathways in the STN region and that cathodic stimulation is in general more efficient. However, relative efficiency varies for different pathways so that anodic stimulation is the least efficient in activating CSBT, more efficient in activating the hyperdirect pathway and as efficient as cathodic in activating STN-GP pathway. Our experiments confirm biophysical model predictions regarding neural activations in the central nervous system and provide evidence that stimulus polarity has differential effects on passing axons, terminal synapses, and local neurons. Comparison of experimental results with clinical DBS studies provides further evidence that the hyperdirect pathway may be involved in the therapeutic mechanisms of DBS.

Brain CommunicationsVol. 7(1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Emory University (US), Duke University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Michigan (US), Johnson University (US), Hope Center for Neurological Disorders (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Neurological disorders and treatments
4.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.