Passive-active variants in the Samaritan Pentateuch

Changes of passive predicates in the Masoretic Text (MT) to active predicates in the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) have long been noted by SP scholars. Most of these changes have been convincingly explained by morpho-phonological and morpho-semantic developments in Samaritan Hebrew (SH), mainly the loss of internal passives and the increased use of Nifʕal to encode passives. However, diachronic developments in SH alone cannot fully explain the passive-active variants found in SP. A sentence-processing evaluation of these variants may help explain the unexpected changes of 48 passive Nifʕal predicates in SP, as well as the retention of over 80% of internal passives in this tradition. It may also illuminate some variants in the opposite direction, i.e., active clauses in MT that appear as passive clauses in SP. It is argued that the non-canonical semantic-syntactic mapping in passive structures, which affects the way passives are interpreted or retrieved, may be involved in the generation of passive-active variants in SP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orientalia Suecana
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33063/os.v73.608
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Passive-active variants in the Samaritan Pentateuch

Einav Fleck
Orientalia Suecana
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

Passive-active variants in the Samaritan Pentateuch

Einav Fleck
article en

Abstract

Changes of passive predicates in the Masoretic Text (MT) to active predicates in the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) have long been noted by SP scholars. Most of these changes have been convincingly explained by morpho-phonological and morpho-semantic developments in Samaritan Hebrew (SH), mainly the loss of internal passives and the increased use of Nifʕal to encode passives. However, diachronic developments in SH alone cannot fully explain the passive-active variants found in SP. A sentence-processing evaluation of these variants may help explain the unexpected changes of 48 passive Nifʕal predicates in SP, as well as the retention of over 80% of internal passives in this tradition. It may also illuminate some variants in the opposite direction, i.e., active clauses in MT that appear as passive clauses in SP. It is argued that the non-canonical semantic-syntactic mapping in passive structures, which affects the way passives are interpreted or retrieved, may be involved in the generation of passive-active variants in SP.

Orientalia SuecanaVol. 73
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.