Validation and Quantification of Possible Model Extensions for a Railway Operations Model Using Delay Data Disaggregation

In simulation of railway traffic, it is crucial to incorporate realistic delays. Delay data can be obtained from historical records containing scheduled and actual times of trains. Labelled or unlabelled with delay causes, these data do not consistently indicate whether a delay is secondary (e.g., caused by another delayed train) or primary (i.e., caused by external or unknown events) for a specific simulation application due to missing, inconsistent, and biased data. In a realistic simulation, only primary delays should be injected, whereas secondary delays emerge from the simulated dynamics. The authors developed an approach to differentiate between primary and secondary delays that is flexible in regard to simulated resources, performing a network analysis and using different thresholds for blocking trains. Finally, the disaggregated primary delays were inserted into a simulation model, showing that it can reproduce the actual total delays with reasonable errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/wsc63780.2024.10838982
Primary Topic
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation and Quantification of Possible Model Extensions for a Railway Operations Model Using Delay Data Disaggregation

Niki Popper, Matthias Wastian, Günter Schneckenreither, Nadine Schwab et al.
4 links
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
article

Validation and Quantification of Possible Model Extensions for a Railway Operations Model Using Delay Data Disaggregation

Niki Popper, Matthias Wastian, Günter Schneckenreither, Nadine Schwab, Matthias Röβler, Hannah Kastinger
article en

Abstract

In simulation of railway traffic, it is crucial to incorporate realistic delays. Delay data can be obtained from historical records containing scheduled and actual times of trains. Labelled or unlabelled with delay causes, these data do not consistently indicate whether a delay is secondary (e.g., caused by another delayed train) or primary (i.e., caused by external or unknown events) for a specific simulation application due to missing, inconsistent, and biased data. In a realistic simulation, only primary delays should be injected, whereas secondary delays emerge from the simulated dynamics. The authors developed an approach to differentiate between primary and secondary delays that is flexible in regard to simulated resources, performing a network analysis and using different thresholds for blocking trains. Finally, the disaggregated primary delays were inserted into a simulation model, showing that it can reproduce the actual total delays with reasonable errors.

TU Wien (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.