Comparison of Different Vector Tracking Architectures in Challenging Urban Environments Using the TEX-CUP Data Set
Positioning in dense urban environments using global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) depicts to this day a challenging task due to the limited sky view and unpredictable multipath propagation. Vector tracking (VT) receiver architectures have proven to be a viable approach to address those challenges. In this work, a comparison between two different implementation strategies, i.e., a centralized approach and a federated one, will be conducted. The publicly available TEX-CUP data set from the University of Texas at Austin is used herein to demonstrate and compare the performance of both implementations under real-world conditions. Despite theoretical expectations, as in [1], the practical performance advantage of the centralized over the federated approach could not be revealed in the processing results.
Authors
- Thomas Pany (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8456-5679)
- Mohamed Bochkati (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7422-4535)
- Christian Siebert
- Michael Meurer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7465-6705)
Institutions
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-12-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/navitec63575.2024.10843459
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.41