Comparison of Different Vector Tracking Architectures in Challenging Urban Environments Using the TEX-CUP Data Set

Positioning in dense urban environments using global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) depicts to this day a challenging task due to the limited sky view and unpredictable multipath propagation. Vector tracking (VT) receiver architectures have proven to be a viable approach to address those challenges. In this work, a comparison between two different implementation strategies, i.e., a centralized approach and a federated one, will be conducted. The publicly available TEX-CUP data set from the University of Texas at Austin is used herein to demonstrate and compare the performance of both implementations under real-world conditions. Despite theoretical expectations, as in [1], the practical performance advantage of the centralized over the federated approach could not be revealed in the processing results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/navitec63575.2024.10843459
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Different Vector Tracking Architectures in Challenging Urban Environments Using the TEX-CUP Data Set

Thomas Pany, Mohamed Bochkati, Christian Siebert, Michael Meurer
2 citations
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
0.41
article

Comparison of Different Vector Tracking Architectures in Challenging Urban Environments Using the TEX-CUP Data Set

Thomas Pany, Mohamed Bochkati, Christian Siebert, Michael Meurer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Positioning in dense urban environments using global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) depicts to this day a challenging task due to the limited sky view and unpredictable multipath propagation. Vector tracking (VT) receiver architectures have proven to be a viable approach to address those challenges. In this work, a comparison between two different implementation strategies, i.e., a centralized approach and a federated one, will be conducted. The publicly available TEX-CUP data set from the University of Texas at Austin is used herein to demonstrate and compare the performance of both implementations under real-world conditions. Despite theoretical expectations, as in [1], the practical performance advantage of the centralized over the federated approach could not be revealed in the processing results.

Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.