Evaluating Production Planning and Control Systems in Different Environments: A Comparative Simulation Study

Selecting the appropriate production planning and control systems (PPCS) presents a significant challenge for many companies, as their performance, i.e., overall costs, depends on the production system environment. Key environmental characteristics include the system's structure, i.e., flow shop, hybrid shop, or job shop, and the planned shop load. Besides selecting a suitable PPCS, its parameterization significantly influences the performance. This publication investigates the performance and the optimal parametrization of Material Requirement Planning (MRP), Reorder Point System (RPS), and Constant Work In Progress (ConWIP) at different stochastic multi-item multi-stage production system environments by conducting a comprehensive full factorial simulation study. The results indicate that MRP and ConWIP generally outperform RPS in all observed environments. Moreover, when comparing MRP with ConWIP, the performance clearly varies depending on the specific production system environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/wsc63780.2024.10838972
Primary Topic
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Production Planning and Control Systems in Different Environments: A Comparative Simulation Study

Klaus Altendorfer, Wolfgang Seiringer, Balwin Bokor
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
article

Evaluating Production Planning and Control Systems in Different Environments: A Comparative Simulation Study

Klaus Altendorfer, Wolfgang Seiringer, Balwin Bokor
article en

Abstract

Selecting the appropriate production planning and control systems (PPCS) presents a significant challenge for many companies, as their performance, i.e., overall costs, depends on the production system environment. Key environmental characteristics include the system's structure, i.e., flow shop, hybrid shop, or job shop, and the planned shop load. Besides selecting a suitable PPCS, its parameterization significantly influences the performance. This publication investigates the performance and the optimal parametrization of Material Requirement Planning (MRP), Reorder Point System (RPS), and Constant Work In Progress (ConWIP) at different stochastic multi-item multi-stage production system environments by conducting a comprehensive full factorial simulation study. The results indicate that MRP and ConWIP generally outperform RPS in all observed environments. Moreover, when comparing MRP with ConWIP, the performance clearly varies depending on the specific production system environment.

University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria (AT)
Austrian Science Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Production Planning and Control Systems in Different Environments: A Comparative Simulation Study — Klaus Altendorfer, Wolfgang Seiringer, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS