Confidence Elicitation Improves Selective Generation in Black-Box Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive capabilities across various domains in natural language processing. However, LLMs can produce fictional content, which we refer to as hallucinations, and it makes the LLMs unreliable. An important research topic is how to make LLMs accurately express the confidence to their answers, so they can refrain from outputting or regenerate output in cases of low-confidence predictions. It facilitates the application of LLMs in high-stakes areas. Currently, research on eliciting calibrated confidence from LLMs is still insufficient. Additionally, methods for estimating uncertainty in responses based on internal parameters of LLMs become unavailable, as many existing LLMs are black boxes served via APIs. Therefore, we analyze the existing confidence elicitation methods and propose COVO, a new confidence elicitation method that allows the black-box LLMs to output their confidence levels by letting the LLM itself judges whether the answer comes from a reliable source. Our method does not require external knowledge and it has high computational efficiency. Experiments show that COVO achieves better calibration and effectively reduces hallucinations in LLMs through selective generation. Additionally, the confidence scores enhance the reliability of the LLMs' responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/smc54092.2024.10831438
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confidence Elicitation Improves Selective Generation in Black-Box Large Language Models

Jun Li, Zhaojuan Yue, Sha Liu
1 citations
Topic Modeling
0.35
article

Confidence Elicitation Improves Selective Generation in Black-Box Large Language Models

Jun Li, Zhaojuan Yue, Sha Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive capabilities across various domains in natural language processing. However, LLMs can produce fictional content, which we refer to as hallucinations, and it makes the LLMs unreliable. An important research topic is how to make LLMs accurately express the confidence to their answers, so they can refrain from outputting or regenerate output in cases of low-confidence predictions. It facilitates the application of LLMs in high-stakes areas. Currently, research on eliciting calibrated confidence from LLMs is still insufficient. Additionally, methods for estimating uncertainty in responses based on internal parameters of LLMs become unavailable, as many existing LLMs are black boxes served via APIs. Therefore, we analyze the existing confidence elicitation methods and propose COVO, a new confidence elicitation method that allows the black-box LLMs to output their confidence levels by letting the LLM itself judges whether the answer comes from a reliable source. Our method does not require external knowledge and it has high computational efficiency. Experiments show that COVO achieves better calibration and effectively reduces hallucinations in LLMs through selective generation. Additionally, the confidence scores enhance the reliability of the LLMs' responses.

Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Computer Network Information Center (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Topic Modeling
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.