Beyond the Hype: A Critical Evaluation of Predictive Analytics Accuracy in High-Stakes Business Decisions

The dawning digital era has brought expectations of massive improvements in the accuracy and value of corporate decision-making relating to strategic direction, business execution, performance management, and workforce management. With the advent of analytics, people-related and other data from disparate systems within a company are being used to predict important organizational outcomes or events such as customer satisfaction, future workforce attrition, expense overruns, project completion problems, etc. This predictive process is typically referred to as advanced, predictive, or prescriptive analytics. In this study, we take a critical look at the current organizational practice of predictive analytics using employee data residing in organizational HR systems. Focusing on high-stakes business outcomes, we consider the data and use of predictive models, and we review what HR professionals are telling their CEOs. We also look to ensure that the self-reported accuracy ratings are realistic and that the business benefits derived from these predictions or recommendations are indeed realized. Addressing this question across six large corporations in India using more than 10 regularly used applications, the results of this study are based on data from 816 HR professionals and 333 business leaders. All use predictive scores from related applications or in their decision-making roles. We find that there are a number of serious model accuracy problems with the applications used. We also find that both HR professionals and business leaders in India suffer from significant accuracy overestimation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/idicaiei61867.2024.10842857
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Hype: A Critical Evaluation of Predictive Analytics Accuracy in High-Stakes Business Decisions

Parihar Suresh Dahake, Nihar Suresh Dahake, Abhijit Gajghate
13 citations
Big Data and Business Intelligence
6.87
article

Beyond the Hype: A Critical Evaluation of Predictive Analytics Accuracy in High-Stakes Business Decisions

Parihar Suresh Dahake, Nihar Suresh Dahake, Abhijit Gajghate
article en
13 citations

Abstract

The dawning digital era has brought expectations of massive improvements in the accuracy and value of corporate decision-making relating to strategic direction, business execution, performance management, and workforce management. With the advent of analytics, people-related and other data from disparate systems within a company are being used to predict important organizational outcomes or events such as customer satisfaction, future workforce attrition, expense overruns, project completion problems, etc. This predictive process is typically referred to as advanced, predictive, or prescriptive analytics. In this study, we take a critical look at the current organizational practice of predictive analytics using employee data residing in organizational HR systems. Focusing on high-stakes business outcomes, we consider the data and use of predictive models, and we review what HR professionals are telling their CEOs. We also look to ensure that the self-reported accuracy ratings are realistic and that the business benefits derived from these predictions or recommendations are indeed realized. Addressing this question across six large corporations in India using more than 10 regularly used applications, the results of this study are based on data from 816 HR professionals and 333 business leaders. All use predictive scores from related applications or in their decision-making roles. We find that there are a number of serious model accuracy problems with the applications used. We also find that both HR professionals and business leaders in India suffer from significant accuracy overestimation.

Raisoni Group of Institutions (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.