MUPO: Unlocking the Potential of Unpaired Data for Single Stage Preference Alignment in Language Models
Preference alignment has recently been on the forefront of helping language model (LM) aligning model behaviors with human preferences, with the most relevant application being chat bots. With the success of Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), there have been many derivative works of the same paradigm that further better different aspects, in both ease of training and performance. Odds Ratio Preference Optimization (ORPO) provides the next step in the development of preference alignment by combining the training pipeline into a single monolithic reference optimization process. In addition, ORPO also eliminates the need for a reference model to further improve on training efficiency without negatively affecting performance. However, ORPO, and many of its predecessor, requires datasets with pre-defined reference pairs of example which could severely limit the amount of compatible training data and lower LM's capability compares to what could be potentially achieved. Inspired by this limitation, we devise a new approach, Monolithic Unpaired Preference Optimization (MUPO), that is capable of making use of the abundantly available data without paired reference and combining the training process into a single monolithic stage for further efficiency and accessibility. Through our experimentation, we found that MUPO's test performances on Stable LM and Phi-2 stayed competitive with previous methods like SFT, SFT+DPO, and ORPO.
Authors
- Thanh Dang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2010-5582)
- Điền Đinh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2069-1016)
- Long Nguyen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0884-1635)
- Tri Quang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5506-0615)
Institutions
- Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VN)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-10-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/smc54092.2024.10831031
- Primary Topic
- Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00