Comparative study between MDI vs DPI and its limitation Bangladesh Perspective

Objective: In this study our main goal is to compare the efficacy of MDI vs DPI and its limitation. Method: This randomized, open-label, parallel-designed trial was carried out at tertiary medical hospital from January 2021 to January 2022. Where a total of 200 adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, and compared the efficacy and safety for asthma control between the 2 groups (MDI, n=100, DPI, n=100) Results: During the study, majority were belonging to 26-33 years age group, 65%. Also, majority had asthma, 50%.in DPIs group 40% exhaling before taking the dose, followed by 86% cases were tilting the head while using the inhaler, all cases loading the dose, 21% cases holding breath after taking the dose, 98% cases were type of exhaling after inhaling the dose, 51% cases waiting around 1 minute between two consecutive inhalations, 47% cases were gargling after taking a corticosteroid inhalation. Whereas in MDIs groups 30% exhaling before taking the dose, followed by 81% cases were tilting the head while using the inhaler, no cases loading the dose, 50% cases holding breath after taking the dose, 92% cases were type of exhaling after inhaling the dose, 49% cases waiting around 1 minute between two consecutive inhalations, 53% cases were gargling after taking a corticosteroid inhalation.in MDIs group proportion of patients without asthma exacerbations was 62% and asthma exacerbations in hospitalization or an emergency department visit during the 12-week 3%. Whereas in DPIs group proportion of patients without asthma exacerbations was 80% and asthma exacerbations in hospitalization or an emergency department visit during the 12-week 4%. Moreover, in MDIs group 9% had Nasopharyngitis followed by 6% had bronchitis, 3% had headache where as in DPIs group 6.2% had Nasopharyngitis followed by 6.3% had bronchitis, 2% had rhinitis, 6% had headache. Conclusion: In conclusion, the study found that a large proportion of adult patients with COPD/asthma in the Lebanese population do not take MDIs/DPIs effectively. However, patients who used DPIs had considerably better administration method. It also revealed that a substantial number of patients were not obtaining the necessary device education. As a result, it is critical for healthcare practitioners to properly teach their patients in order to reap the most advantages from the devices and avoid exacerbations and worsening of symptoms.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Barind Medical College Journal
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70818/bmcj.2024.v010i02.006
Primary Topic
Advanced Data Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study between MDI vs DPI and its limitation Bangladesh Perspective

Barind Medical College Journal
Advanced Data Processing Techniques
article

Comparative study between MDI vs DPI and its limitation Bangladesh Perspective

article en

Abstract

Objective: In this study our main goal is to compare the efficacy of MDI vs DPI and its limitation. Method: This randomized, open-label, parallel-designed trial was carried out at tertiary medical hospital from January 2021 to January 2022. Where a total of 200 adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, and compared the efficacy and safety for asthma control between the 2 groups (MDI, n=100, DPI, n=100) Results: During the study, majority were belonging to 26-33 years age group, 65%. Also, majority had asthma, 50%.in DPIs group 40% exhaling before taking the dose, followed by 86% cases were tilting the head while using the inhaler, all cases loading the dose, 21% cases holding breath after taking the dose, 98% cases were type of exhaling after inhaling the dose, 51% cases waiting around 1 minute between two consecutive inhalations, 47% cases were gargling after taking a corticosteroid inhalation. Whereas in MDIs groups 30% exhaling before taking the dose, followed by 81% cases were tilting the head while using the inhaler, no cases loading the dose, 50% cases holding breath after taking the dose, 92% cases were type of exhaling after inhaling the dose, 49% cases waiting around 1 minute between two consecutive inhalations, 53% cases were gargling after taking a corticosteroid inhalation.in MDIs group proportion of patients without asthma exacerbations was 62% and asthma exacerbations in hospitalization or an emergency department visit during the 12-week 3%. Whereas in DPIs group proportion of patients without asthma exacerbations was 80% and asthma exacerbations in hospitalization or an emergency department visit during the 12-week 4%. Moreover, in MDIs group 9% had Nasopharyngitis followed by 6% had bronchitis, 3% had headache where as in DPIs group 6.2% had Nasopharyngitis followed by 6.3% had bronchitis, 2% had rhinitis, 6% had headache. Conclusion: In conclusion, the study found that a large proportion of adult patients with COPD/asthma in the Lebanese population do not take MDIs/DPIs effectively. However, patients who used DPIs had considerably better administration method. It also revealed that a substantial number of patients were not obtaining the necessary device education. As a result, it is critical for healthcare practitioners to properly teach their patients in order to reap the most advantages from the devices and avoid exacerbations and worsening of symptoms.

Barind Medical College JournalVol. 10(2)
Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College (BD), Women Medical College (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Advanced Data Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.