Efficacy of Direct SPT-Based Pile Design Methods in Residual Soils of Southern Africa

Direct SPT-based pile design methods are very popular these days despite the fact that many of such methods are based on small databases of pile load tests. Due to the dependence of soil behaviour on geological setting and site specific conditions, it is possible that some of the methods do not produce good prediction of pile capacity. Accordingly this paper presents the evaluation of two SPT-based pile design methods in residual soils against a pile load test database from the Southern African region. The methods include the (i) Franki-SA method reported in Byrne et al. (1995) and (ii) Decourt Method (1995). The pile load tests consist of 26 cases of bored piles in residual soil with each case accompanied by SPT measurements. The SPT measurements were used to calculate the predicted capacity in accordance with the procedure for each of the two methods while the pile load tests were used to determine the measured capacity. The findings of the evaluation indicate that the Decourt method is more reliable and accurate than the SA method. The poor performance of the SA methods suggests further studies to develop specific calculation factors for base and shaft capacities in residual soils.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54203/jceu.2024.31
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Direct SPT-Based Pile Design Methods in Residual Soils of Southern Africa

Mahongo Dithinde, Tshepo Masilo
Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Efficacy of Direct SPT-Based Pile Design Methods in Residual Soils of Southern Africa

Mahongo Dithinde, Tshepo Masilo
article en

Abstract

Direct SPT-based pile design methods are very popular these days despite the fact that many of such methods are based on small databases of pile load tests. Due to the dependence of soil behaviour on geological setting and site specific conditions, it is possible that some of the methods do not produce good prediction of pile capacity. Accordingly this paper presents the evaluation of two SPT-based pile design methods in residual soils against a pile load test database from the Southern African region. The methods include the (i) Franki-SA method reported in Byrne et al. (1995) and (ii) Decourt Method (1995). The pile load tests consist of 26 cases of bored piles in residual soil with each case accompanied by SPT measurements. The SPT measurements were used to calculate the predicted capacity in accordance with the procedure for each of the two methods while the pile load tests were used to determine the measured capacity. The findings of the evaluation indicate that the Decourt method is more reliable and accurate than the SA method. The poor performance of the SA methods suggests further studies to develop specific calculation factors for base and shaft capacities in residual soils.

Journal of Civil Engineering and UrbanismVol. 14(3s)
University of Botswana (BW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Efficacy of Direct SPT-Based Pile Design Methods in Residual Soils of Southern Africa — Mahongo Dithinde, Tshepo Masilo · Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS