Addressing Past Tense Temporal Attacks in Large Language Models through Multiple Methods

Several previous studies highlight the problems that several state-of-art large language models are vulnerable under past tense attack (e.g.,” How to make a Molotov cocktail?” to” How did people make a Molotov cocktail?”). In this paper, we try several methods to address this problem on GPT-3.5-Turbo. The single prompt-engineering method reached a 1% attack success rate and a 17% over-refusal rate, and llama-2-7b trained on the Latent Adversarial Training method reached a 0% asr. However, its over-refusal rate was 48%. As an alternative method, we tried to build an advisor with a filter based on LLM, which can perform internet searching to check the safety of the content and provide more information with more timely related resources. With more information, the model can give more detailed insight even if it gives a possible refusal with “Sorry.” Source code at https://github.com/t0rit0/2024-summer-project

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3704217.3705008
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing Past Tense Temporal Attacks in Large Language Models through Multiple Methods

Z M Jin, Nai-ji Zhai, Xianyi Tuo
Topic Modeling
article

Addressing Past Tense Temporal Attacks in Large Language Models through Multiple Methods

Z M Jin, Nai-ji Zhai, Xianyi Tuo
article en

Abstract

Several previous studies highlight the problems that several state-of-art large language models are vulnerable under past tense attack (e.g.,” How to make a Molotov cocktail?” to” How did people make a Molotov cocktail?”). In this paper, we try several methods to address this problem on GPT-3.5-Turbo. The single prompt-engineering method reached a 1% attack success rate and a 17% over-refusal rate, and llama-2-7b trained on the Latent Adversarial Training method reached a 0% asr. However, its over-refusal rate was 48%. As an alternative method, we tried to build an advisor with a filter based on LLM, which can perform internet searching to check the safety of the content and provide more information with more timely related resources. With more information, the model can give more detailed insight even if it gives a possible refusal with “Sorry.” Source code at https://github.com/t0rit0/2024-summer-project

University of Colorado Boulder (US), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.