The Effect of ESG Management on Corporate Long-term Performance

[Purpose] This study is to examine the financial factors influencing ESG ratings and to analyze the impact of ESG ratings and individual ESG components on firms’ long-term performance. [Methodology] The ESG ratings are obtained from the Korea Corporate Governance Service (KCGS). The financial factors such as cash ratio, debt ratio, company size are from FNGUIDE. By using data for 4,080 firm-years that received ESG ratings from 2012 to 2021, this study examines if ESG ratings affect on firms’ long-term performance. The long-term performance is measured by the return on total assets (ROA) from period t+1 to t+4. [Findings] Our findings show that ESG rating is high, the more the firms have cash, the bigger the firms’ size, and the higher the firms’ ROA. We find that an increase in ESG activities is positively correlated with long-term firm performance, extending up to year t+4. However, when analyzing the individual components of ESG - namely Environment (E), Social (S), and Governance (G) activities - we find that while firm performance initially increases until t+2, it declines thereafter. [Implications] Our study provides valuable insights to managers and stakeholders, emphasizing the importance of understanding external environmental, social, and governance aspects by analyzing the financial factors that influence ESG management. Additionally, our findings strengthen the previous studies by examining the varying effects of ESG activities on corporate performance over time, highlighting that the impact may differ across ESG components. These results suggest that companies need to consider the efficient resource allocation in the long-term by balancing costs and benefits from individual ESG activities.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29189/kaiaair.42.4.5
Primary Topic
Business and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of ESG Management on Corporate Long-term Performance

Hyo Chae Paik, Minkyu Paik
Business and Economic Development
article

The Effect of ESG Management on Corporate Long-term Performance

Hyo Chae Paik, Minkyu Paik
article en

Abstract

[Purpose] This study is to examine the financial factors influencing ESG ratings and to analyze the impact of ESG ratings and individual ESG components on firms’ long-term performance. [Methodology] The ESG ratings are obtained from the Korea Corporate Governance Service (KCGS). The financial factors such as cash ratio, debt ratio, company size are from FNGUIDE. By using data for 4,080 firm-years that received ESG ratings from 2012 to 2021, this study examines if ESG ratings affect on firms’ long-term performance. The long-term performance is measured by the return on total assets (ROA) from period t+1 to t+4. [Findings] Our findings show that ESG rating is high, the more the firms have cash, the bigger the firms’ size, and the higher the firms’ ROA. We find that an increase in ESG activities is positively correlated with long-term firm performance, extending up to year t+4. However, when analyzing the individual components of ESG - namely Environment (E), Social (S), and Governance (G) activities - we find that while firm performance initially increases until t+2, it declines thereafter. [Implications] Our study provides valuable insights to managers and stakeholders, emphasizing the importance of understanding external environmental, social, and governance aspects by analyzing the financial factors that influence ESG management. Additionally, our findings strengthen the previous studies by examining the varying effects of ESG activities on corporate performance over time, highlighting that the impact may differ across ESG components. These results suggest that companies need to consider the efficient resource allocation in the long-term by balancing costs and benefits from individual ESG activities.

Vol. 42(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Business and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.