Enhancing the inclusion of all pupils: A consequence of a community of philosophical inquiry

This article presents the results of qualitative research conducted in a public primary school, investigating whether the formation of a community of inquiry and the work of children within it, according to its governing principles, can constitute an inclusive practice. By referring to international literature, the article attempts to clarify the concepts of Philosophy for/with Children (P4C), the Community of Philosophical Inquiry, and inclusion. The research results showed that P4C was able to promote the principles of inclusion within this sample. Students, regardless of their performance, socio-economic background, or learning profile, had the opportunity to coexist, communicate, interact, discuss, disagree, agree, and collaborate.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Innovation.
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69685/xxqv7278
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing the inclusion of all pupils: A consequence of a community of philosophical inquiry

ELISSAVET GIAMAKIDOU
International Journal of Educational Innovation.
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Enhancing the inclusion of all pupils: A consequence of a community of philosophical inquiry

ELISSAVET GIAMAKIDOU
article en

Abstract

This article presents the results of qualitative research conducted in a public primary school, investigating whether the formation of a community of inquiry and the work of children within it, according to its governing principles, can constitute an inclusive practice. By referring to international literature, the article attempts to clarify the concepts of Philosophy for/with Children (P4C), the Community of Philosophical Inquiry, and inclusion. The research results showed that P4C was able to promote the principles of inclusion within this sample. Students, regardless of their performance, socio-economic background, or learning profile, had the opportunity to coexist, communicate, interact, discuss, disagree, agree, and collaborate.

International Journal of Educational Innovation.Vol. 6(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.