Transformative Action Research for Purposes of Academic and Scientific Socialization in Greek Tertiary Geotechnical Education

This paper presents a qualitative action research study, designed to explore the transformative impact of critical thinking on undergraduate Geotechnical Education students in Greece. The methodology was an intervention, consisting of thirteen workshops, premised on aesthetic experience and research action. A pre-intervention discussion identified limited academic and scientific socialization and, therefore, demonstrated the need to address this challenge. A focus group discussion was conducted halfway through the research to evaluate the development of the research process. A written interview, upon completion of the intervention, shed light on the impact of the experience on the students. This action research draws on constructivist learning theory, presupposing reflection, action and collective work. Although the data analysis process is currently in progress, initial findings establish broadening of assumptions about the role and mission of a geotechnical scientist, empowerment of soft skills, as well as student agentive potential.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Innovation.
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69685/mjmo6087
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transformative Action Research for Purposes of Academic and Scientific Socialization in Greek Tertiary Geotechnical Education

Γεωργία Κουτσού
1 links
International Journal of Educational Innovation.
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

Transformative Action Research for Purposes of Academic and Scientific Socialization in Greek Tertiary Geotechnical Education

Γεωργία Κουτσού
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a qualitative action research study, designed to explore the transformative impact of critical thinking on undergraduate Geotechnical Education students in Greece. The methodology was an intervention, consisting of thirteen workshops, premised on aesthetic experience and research action. A pre-intervention discussion identified limited academic and scientific socialization and, therefore, demonstrated the need to address this challenge. A focus group discussion was conducted halfway through the research to evaluate the development of the research process. A written interview, upon completion of the intervention, shed light on the impact of the experience on the students. This action research draws on constructivist learning theory, presupposing reflection, action and collective work. Although the data analysis process is currently in progress, initial findings establish broadening of assumptions about the role and mission of a geotechnical scientist, empowerment of soft skills, as well as student agentive potential.

International Journal of Educational Innovation.Vol. 6(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.