The Distribution of Discourse Markers in Educational Discourse

Discourse markers play a crucial role in communication. They have a vital role in connecting sentences and utterances making the conversation or talk coherent. This study sheds light on the distribution of discourse markers in communication particularly in educational discourse. It attempts to show the function of some discourse markers, namely: because, but, and so; and how they are distributed in educational settings. The study adopts Shiffrin’s 1987 model focusing on the local and global functions. It is based on the hypothesis that discourse markers display relationships that are local (between adjacent utterances) or global (across wider spans and/or structures of discourse). It adopts both qualitative and quantitative methods in the analysis of data under investigation. The study ends up with the conclusion that discourse markers can be used locally or globally referring back to adjacent utterances or remote ones.

Publication Details

Journal
Mağallaẗ abḥāṯ al-Baṣraẗ li-l-ʿulūm al-insāniyyaẗ.
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59750/jobrhs.49.4.27
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Distribution of Discourse Markers in Educational Discourse

Mağallaẗ abḥāṯ al-Baṣraẗ li-l-ʿulūm al-insāniyyaẗ.
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

The Distribution of Discourse Markers in Educational Discourse

article en

Abstract

Discourse markers play a crucial role in communication. They have a vital role in connecting sentences and utterances making the conversation or talk coherent. This study sheds light on the distribution of discourse markers in communication particularly in educational discourse. It attempts to show the function of some discourse markers, namely: because, but, and so; and how they are distributed in educational settings. The study adopts Shiffrin’s 1987 model focusing on the local and global functions. It is based on the hypothesis that discourse markers display relationships that are local (between adjacent utterances) or global (across wider spans and/or structures of discourse). It adopts both qualitative and quantitative methods in the analysis of data under investigation. The study ends up with the conclusion that discourse markers can be used locally or globally referring back to adjacent utterances or remote ones.

Mağallaẗ abḥāṯ al-Baṣraẗ li-l-ʿulūm al-insāniyyaẗ.(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.