Optical Character Recognition: Comparative Analysis of Tesseract and Textract on Diverse Datasets

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is essential for converting images and scanned documents into machine-readable text. Advances in deep learning and machine learning have enhanced OCR capabilities, allowing for tasks such as handwritten text recognition and structured data extraction. This paper compares two OCR engines: Tesseract, an open-source tool, and Amazon Textract, a cloud-based service. Their performance is tested on three datasets; printed text, handwritten documents, and financial records. Amazon Textract demonstrates superior accuracy and scalability due to its cloud infrastructure, while Tesseract remains a cost-effective option but struggles with complex layouts. This study offers insights for selecting OCR tools based on document complexity and processing needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icacrs62842.2024.10841500
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optical Character Recognition: Comparative Analysis of Tesseract and Textract on Diverse Datasets

Mrugendrasinh Rahevar, Deep Kothadiya, Arpita Shah, Manali Modi
1 citations
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
0.25
article

Optical Character Recognition: Comparative Analysis of Tesseract and Textract on Diverse Datasets

Mrugendrasinh Rahevar, Deep Kothadiya, Arpita Shah, Manali Modi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is essential for converting images and scanned documents into machine-readable text. Advances in deep learning and machine learning have enhanced OCR capabilities, allowing for tasks such as handwritten text recognition and structured data extraction. This paper compares two OCR engines: Tesseract, an open-source tool, and Amazon Textract, a cloud-based service. Their performance is tested on three datasets; printed text, handwritten documents, and financial records. Amazon Textract demonstrates superior accuracy and scalability due to its cloud infrastructure, while Tesseract remains a cost-effective option but struggles with complex layouts. This study offers insights for selecting OCR tools based on document complexity and processing needs.

Charotar University of Science and Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
0.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.