Assessing Speech-to-Text Translation Quality: An Overview of Key Metrics

Speech-to-text translation plays a pivotal role in numerous real-world applications, from virtual assistants to live translations. Ensuring high-quality translations requires robust evaluation metrics tailored to different model architectures. This paper presents a detailed review of key metrics for evaluating speech-to-text translation quality. Standard metrics like Character Error Rate, Word Error Rate, and BLEU are introduced, with an explanation of their calculation methods. The paper also explores metrics tailored to cascade models, addressing WER for automatic speech recognition, BLEU, METEOR, and Translation Edit Rate for machine translation, while considering pipeline latency in real-time scenarios. For end-to-end models, metrics such as BLEU, ROUGE, METEOR, and Joint Error Rate are discussed, along with the impact of end-to-end latency. The paper concludes by underscoring the importance of selecting the appropriate evaluation metrics and suggests areas for future research in metric development and model assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/dasa63652.2024.10836447
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Speech-to-Text Translation Quality: An Overview of Key Metrics

Maria Labied, Mouad Banane, Abdessamad Belangour
3 citations
Natural Language Processing Techniques
1.04
article

Assessing Speech-to-Text Translation Quality: An Overview of Key Metrics

Maria Labied, Mouad Banane, Abdessamad Belangour
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Speech-to-text translation plays a pivotal role in numerous real-world applications, from virtual assistants to live translations. Ensuring high-quality translations requires robust evaluation metrics tailored to different model architectures. This paper presents a detailed review of key metrics for evaluating speech-to-text translation quality. Standard metrics like Character Error Rate, Word Error Rate, and BLEU are introduced, with an explanation of their calculation methods. The paper also explores metrics tailored to cascade models, addressing WER for automatic speech recognition, BLEU, METEOR, and Translation Edit Rate for machine translation, while considering pipeline latency in real-time scenarios. For end-to-end models, metrics such as BLEU, ROUGE, METEOR, and Joint Error Rate are discussed, along with the impact of end-to-end latency. The paper concludes by underscoring the importance of selecting the appropriate evaluation metrics and suggests areas for future research in metric development and model assessment.

University of Hassan II Casablanca (MA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Speech-to-Text Translation Quality: An Overview of Key Metrics — Maria Labied, Mouad Banane, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS