Artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights with special reference to patent and copyright

Artificial intelligence (AI) has come to stay. The use of AI has helped human society greatly. At the same time, it has posed several concerns or issues. One of the issues concerns intellectual property rights (IPR). There has been a debate about whether IPR should be given to AI. Countries like Australia and South Africa have granted IPR in favor of AI. At the same time, countries such as the United States have not recognized IPR in favor of AI. Many countries firmly believe that human intervention is required to grant an IPR. Be it copyright, patent, etc., human intervention is a condition precedent.On the other hand, the countries in favor of granting IPR to AI believe in AI as a person capable of creating literary work or innovation and are convinced to grant AI with IPR. Before we recognize IPR in favor of AI, we have to grant the person’s status to AI. This paper aims to understand various issues related to identifying or non-recognizing IPR to AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
THE SCIENTIFIC TEMPER
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58414/scientifictemper.2024.15.spl-2.15
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights with special reference to patent and copyright

Archana Gadekar, Hemang Manish Shah
THE SCIENTIFIC TEMPER
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights with special reference to patent and copyright

Archana Gadekar, Hemang Manish Shah
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has come to stay. The use of AI has helped human society greatly. At the same time, it has posed several concerns or issues. One of the issues concerns intellectual property rights (IPR). There has been a debate about whether IPR should be given to AI. Countries like Australia and South Africa have granted IPR in favor of AI. At the same time, countries such as the United States have not recognized IPR in favor of AI. Many countries firmly believe that human intervention is required to grant an IPR. Be it copyright, patent, etc., human intervention is a condition precedent.On the other hand, the countries in favor of granting IPR to AI believe in AI as a person capable of creating literary work or innovation and are convinced to grant AI with IPR. Before we recognize IPR in favor of AI, we have to grant the person’s status to AI. This paper aims to understand various issues related to identifying or non-recognizing IPR to AI.

THE SCIENTIFIC TEMPERVol. 15(spl-2)
Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.