Girls’ and Women’s Education in Asia: Exploring Philanthropic Networks

This article reports the results of a network analysis on the financing and implementation networks of private foundations characterized as regional and/or domestic that supported targeted girls’ and women’s education initiatives in two subregions of Asia: South Asia and East Asia and the Pacific. It analyzes an originally constructed dataset of 318 unique funders, 52 targeted girls’ and women’s initiatives, and 85 unique implementers. The analysis finds the overwhelming majority of girls’ and women’s initiatives were concentrated in India, as were the domestic and regional private foundations. Overall, the networks of private foundations, cofunders, and implementers are incohesive. The majority of private foundations with the most influence on girls’ and women’s education financing activities were international private foundations. Finally, while the majority of cofunders were private companies/corporations, network actors with the most influence were private foundations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Education Review
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733529
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Girls’ and Women’s Education in Asia: Exploring Philanthropic Networks

Robin Shields, Iván Matovich, Prachi Srivastava, Yogesh Jadhav
1 citations
Comparative Education Review
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
2.23
article

Girls’ and Women’s Education in Asia: Exploring Philanthropic Networks

Robin Shields, Iván Matovich, Prachi Srivastava, Yogesh Jadhav
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article reports the results of a network analysis on the financing and implementation networks of private foundations characterized as regional and/or domestic that supported targeted girls’ and women’s education initiatives in two subregions of Asia: South Asia and East Asia and the Pacific. It analyzes an originally constructed dataset of 318 unique funders, 52 targeted girls’ and women’s initiatives, and 85 unique implementers. The analysis finds the overwhelming majority of girls’ and women’s initiatives were concentrated in India, as were the domestic and regional private foundations. Overall, the networks of private foundations, cofunders, and implementers are incohesive. The majority of private foundations with the most influence on girls’ and women’s education financing activities were international private foundations. Finally, while the majority of cofunders were private companies/corporations, network actors with the most influence were private foundations.

Comparative Education ReviewVol. 68(4)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.