The Role of Constitutional Courts: Limits of Judicial Activism and the Safeguarding of Democratic Processes

Federalism and the Rule of Law require a public body to assume a key role in constitutional oversight, a responsibility often assigned to the Courts across various models, such as the diffuse system in North America, the concentrated system in Europe, and hybrid systems like Brazil's.This paper not only examines this role but also considers how Courts may expand their influence, sometimes encroaching on legislative domains.While proponents of judicial activism argue for greater judicial independence in enforcing the Constitution, proceduralists contend that the Courts should primarily ensure the functioning of legitimate political processes.This study explores the boundaries of constitutional interpretation and the safeguards necessary to preserve judicial authority, relying on bibliographical and case law research, along with the deductive method.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Estudios constitucionales
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002024000200010
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Constitutional Courts: Limits of Judicial Activism and the Safeguarding of Democratic Processes

Emerson Ademir Borges de Oliveira, Lara Guimarães Piacenti, Guilherme Moraes Cardoso
1 citations
Estudios constitucionales
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
4.07
article

The Role of Constitutional Courts: Limits of Judicial Activism and the Safeguarding of Democratic Processes

Emerson Ademir Borges de Oliveira, Lara Guimarães Piacenti, Guilherme Moraes Cardoso
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Federalism and the Rule of Law require a public body to assume a key role in constitutional oversight, a responsibility often assigned to the Courts across various models, such as the diffuse system in North America, the concentrated system in Europe, and hybrid systems like Brazil's.This paper not only examines this role but also considers how Courts may expand their influence, sometimes encroaching on legislative domains.While proponents of judicial activism argue for greater judicial independence in enforcing the Constitution, proceduralists contend that the Courts should primarily ensure the functioning of legitimate political processes.This study explores the boundaries of constitutional interpretation and the safeguards necessary to preserve judicial authority, relying on bibliographical and case law research, along with the deductive method.

Estudios constitucionalesVol. 22(2)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
4.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Role of Constitutional Courts: Limits of Judicial Activism and the Safeguarding of Democratic Processes — Emerson Ademir Borges de Oliveira, Lara Guimarães Piacenti, et al. · Estudios constitucionales (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS