Comparative Analysis of Research and Development Productivity among European Countries

In 2024, the Korean government drastically reduced its budget by emphasizing financial soundness and efficiency of R&D investment. Meanwhile, this discussion is in line with the R&D Paradox discussed in Europe around the 2000s. Accordingly, this paper surveyed G10 European countries, Germany, the UK, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Italy, which have joined the OECD for the past 50 years (1970-2020), for the total amount of R&D investment, total factor productivity, which is a proxy for science and technology development, and economic growth variables were estimated based on the permanent inventory method and growth accounting, respectively. The causal relationship between these variables was empirically analyzed based on the Cobb-Douglas production function. As a result of the analysis, the R&D stock of six European countries had a positive effect on both science and technology development and economic growth, and it was found to be statistically significant. However, the causal relationship between R&D stock and TFP was estimated somewhat differently by country, and the efficiency of R&D investment was higher in Germany, France, and Belgium than in the UK, the Netherlands, and Italy. In particular, major European countries were showing a decreasing trend of total factor productivity, which is a proxy for science and technology development. In addition, companies' R&D investment efficiency is gradually higher than that of the government. This suggests that it is necessary to improve the efficiency of R&D investment by revitalizing joint R&D and open innovation between the government and companies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Institute for Future Growth
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29143/kuifg.2024.10.2.129
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Research and Development Productivity among European Countries

Kangwon Lee, Jaeho Jung
Institute for Future Growth
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

Comparative Analysis of Research and Development Productivity among European Countries

Kangwon Lee, Jaeho Jung
article en

Abstract

In 2024, the Korean government drastically reduced its budget by emphasizing financial soundness and efficiency of R&D investment. Meanwhile, this discussion is in line with the R&D Paradox discussed in Europe around the 2000s. Accordingly, this paper surveyed G10 European countries, Germany, the UK, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Italy, which have joined the OECD for the past 50 years (1970-2020), for the total amount of R&D investment, total factor productivity, which is a proxy for science and technology development, and economic growth variables were estimated based on the permanent inventory method and growth accounting, respectively. The causal relationship between these variables was empirically analyzed based on the Cobb-Douglas production function. As a result of the analysis, the R&D stock of six European countries had a positive effect on both science and technology development and economic growth, and it was found to be statistically significant. However, the causal relationship between R&D stock and TFP was estimated somewhat differently by country, and the efficiency of R&D investment was higher in Germany, France, and Belgium than in the UK, the Netherlands, and Italy. In particular, major European countries were showing a decreasing trend of total factor productivity, which is a proxy for science and technology development. In addition, companies' R&D investment efficiency is gradually higher than that of the government. This suggests that it is necessary to improve the efficiency of R&D investment by revitalizing joint R&D and open innovation between the government and companies.

Institute for Future GrowthVol. 10(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.