Understanding the Intrinsic Characteristics of Spatial Partitioning in Distributed Spatial Join

Spatial join has become a frequently used yet resource-intensive operation in geospatial applications, driven by the increasing volume and complexity of geospatial data. With Hadoop and Spark becoming the de facto standard platforms for distributed computing, scalable spatial data processing is primarily achieved by partitioning the input space to form parallel units on these platforms. Effective spatial data partitioning is critical for task parallelization and load balancing, but it faces significant challenges due to data skew and the geometric and topological complexity of spatial objects, particularly in supporting spatial joins. This paper examines the interplay among query performance, spatial data partitioning, query types, data, and system characteristics. We qualitatively and quantitatively analyze the features of representative partitioning algorithms that impact overall query performance. Along with these analyses, we propose a data sampling-based approach for selecting optimized partitioning strategies. Extensive experiments on large and complex datasets using MapReduce frameworks are conducted to validate the correctness of our analysis and the effectiveness of our optimization approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825846
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Data Management and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Intrinsic Characteristics of Spatial Partitioning in Distributed Spatial Join

Dejun Teng, Zhuohan Xu, Fusheng Wang, Zhaohui Peng
2 citations
Data Management and Algorithms
0.70
article

Understanding the Intrinsic Characteristics of Spatial Partitioning in Distributed Spatial Join

Dejun Teng, Zhuohan Xu, Fusheng Wang, Zhaohui Peng
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Spatial join has become a frequently used yet resource-intensive operation in geospatial applications, driven by the increasing volume and complexity of geospatial data. With Hadoop and Spark becoming the de facto standard platforms for distributed computing, scalable spatial data processing is primarily achieved by partitioning the input space to form parallel units on these platforms. Effective spatial data partitioning is critical for task parallelization and load balancing, but it faces significant challenges due to data skew and the geometric and topological complexity of spatial objects, particularly in supporting spatial joins. This paper examines the interplay among query performance, spatial data partitioning, query types, data, and system characteristics. We qualitatively and quantitatively analyze the features of representative partitioning algorithms that impact overall query performance. Along with these analyses, we propose a data sampling-based approach for selecting optimized partitioning strategies. Extensive experiments on large and complex datasets using MapReduce frameworks are conducted to validate the correctness of our analysis and the effectiveness of our optimization approach.

Shandong University (CN), Stony Brook University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, HORIZON EUROPE Health
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Data Management and Algorithms
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding the Intrinsic Characteristics of Spatial Partitioning in Distributed Spatial Join — Dejun Teng, Zhuohan Xu, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS