Shaping Perceptions: Media Framing and Tone in reporting Kerala's Landslides

This study investigates the impact of media narratives on disaster risk and response in Kerala, India, focusing on landslides from 2018 to 2022. Through a comprehensive content analysis of three national and three regional newspapers, we examined how print media framed and portrayed significant landslides. Our findings reveal a predominant use of negative tones, emphasizing the severity and adverse impacts of these events. The most utilized frame was the responsibility frame, highlighting Governmental and NGO roles in managing disasters. Economic consequences and human-interest frames also received significant attention, reflecting the broader impacts on the economy and personal stories of affected individuals. Notably, the morality frame was absent, indicating a lack of moral and ethical discussions in the media coverage. This study underscores the media's critical role in shaping public perception and influencing disaster management policies. By highlighting the biases and framing choices in media coverage, we provide valuable insights for media practitioners, policymakers and researchers to enhance disaster communication strategies, fostering resilience and improving disaster preparedness and response in vulnerable regions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Disaster Advances
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25303/182da018023
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shaping Perceptions: Media Framing and Tone in reporting Kerala's Landslides

Hussein Ramadan Mohammed
Disaster Advances
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Shaping Perceptions: Media Framing and Tone in reporting Kerala's Landslides

Hussein Ramadan Mohammed
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of media narratives on disaster risk and response in Kerala, India, focusing on landslides from 2018 to 2022. Through a comprehensive content analysis of three national and three regional newspapers, we examined how print media framed and portrayed significant landslides. Our findings reveal a predominant use of negative tones, emphasizing the severity and adverse impacts of these events. The most utilized frame was the responsibility frame, highlighting Governmental and NGO roles in managing disasters. Economic consequences and human-interest frames also received significant attention, reflecting the broader impacts on the economy and personal stories of affected individuals. Notably, the morality frame was absent, indicating a lack of moral and ethical discussions in the media coverage. This study underscores the media's critical role in shaping public perception and influencing disaster management policies. By highlighting the biases and framing choices in media coverage, we provide valuable insights for media practitioners, policymakers and researchers to enhance disaster communication strategies, fostering resilience and improving disaster preparedness and response in vulnerable regions.

Disaster AdvancesVol. 18(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.