Pupils’interactions and decision-making in an educational game

By way of video observations, the current article examines the social interaction of pupils playing an educational card game about fractions, focusing on their epistemic and deontic negotiations during decision-making in dyads. Our findings reveal recurring patterns in how pupils make decisions, emphasising the importance of both epistemic (knowledge-based) and deontic (rights-based) negotiations. Additionally, pupils often struggle to anticipate and manage resistance from peers when negotiating decisions. When resistance occurs, the interaction shifts from negotiating the basis of knowledge (epistemics) to negotiating the right to determine future actions (deontics). The implications of these findings highlight the need for structured support in educational games to foster more productive learning interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Inquiry
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2025.2452010
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pupils’interactions and decision-making in an educational game

Wenche Rønning, Fredrik Rusk, Senja Celius
Education Inquiry
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Pupils’interactions and decision-making in an educational game

Wenche Rønning, Fredrik Rusk, Senja Celius
article en

Abstract

By way of video observations, the current article examines the social interaction of pupils playing an educational card game about fractions, focusing on their epistemic and deontic negotiations during decision-making in dyads. Our findings reveal recurring patterns in how pupils make decisions, emphasising the importance of both epistemic (knowledge-based) and deontic (rights-based) negotiations. Additionally, pupils often struggle to anticipate and manage resistance from peers when negotiating decisions. When resistance occurs, the interaction shifts from negotiating the basis of knowledge (epistemics) to negotiating the right to determine future actions (deontics). The implications of these findings highlight the need for structured support in educational games to foster more productive learning interactions.

Education Inquiry
Åbo Akademi University (FI), Nord University (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pupils’interactions and decision-making in an educational game — Wenche Rønning, Fredrik Rusk, et al. · Education Inquiry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS