Analysis of Muscle Recruitment Differences Around the Knee Joint during Cutting maneuvers and Running

The purpose of this study is to analyze the biomechanical variables affecting the knee joint during cutting and running and to identify the activation patterns of active and passive forces by muscles. Twenty male participants performed running and cutting at a speed of 4.5±0.2 m/s. During running, they sprinted forward after the right foot contact on the force plate, whereas in the cutting, they shifted to the left within a range of 35° to 55° from the forward direction. Kinematic and kinetic variables were calculated, such as maximum knee joint angle, angular velocity, ground reaction force (GRF), moment, work, and shear force. The maximum forces of the knee flexor and extensor muscle groups were extracted through musculoskeletal modeling. During the passive phase of the cutting, the knee joint showed significantly greater abduction angles compared to running ( p<.05). GRF during the cutting were higher in the medial and vertical directions ( p<.05). Negative work and shear forces were greater during cutting than running ( p<.05). In the active phase, the joint moments for flexion, adduction, and internal rotation were significantly greater during cutting ( p<.05). Active muscle forces were higher in the biceps femoris long head, gracilis, semimembranosus, semitendinosus during cutting ( p<.05). The biceps femoris long head and gracilis showed greater active forces in the cutting, while the biceps femoris short head was more active during running ( p<.05). The cutting required certain knee flexors and hamstrings to exert greater forces to reduce knee joint loading during rotation, resulting in distinct differences in biomechanical variables and muscle recruitment patterns compared to running.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Sports Science
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35159/kjss.2024.12.33.6.733
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Muscle Recruitment Differences Around the Knee Joint during Cutting maneuvers and Running

Sung‐Min Kim, Je-Heon oon
Korean Journal of Sports Science
Sports Performance and Training
article

Analysis of Muscle Recruitment Differences Around the Knee Joint during Cutting maneuvers and Running

Sung‐Min Kim, Je-Heon oon
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the biomechanical variables affecting the knee joint during cutting and running and to identify the activation patterns of active and passive forces by muscles. Twenty male participants performed running and cutting at a speed of 4.5±0.2 m/s. During running, they sprinted forward after the right foot contact on the force plate, whereas in the cutting, they shifted to the left within a range of 35° to 55° from the forward direction. Kinematic and kinetic variables were calculated, such as maximum knee joint angle, angular velocity, ground reaction force (GRF), moment, work, and shear force. The maximum forces of the knee flexor and extensor muscle groups were extracted through musculoskeletal modeling. During the passive phase of the cutting, the knee joint showed significantly greater abduction angles compared to running ( p<.05). GRF during the cutting were higher in the medial and vertical directions ( p<.05). Negative work and shear forces were greater during cutting than running ( p<.05). In the active phase, the joint moments for flexion, adduction, and internal rotation were significantly greater during cutting ( p<.05). Active muscle forces were higher in the biceps femoris long head, gracilis, semimembranosus, semitendinosus during cutting ( p<.05). The biceps femoris long head and gracilis showed greater active forces in the cutting, while the biceps femoris short head was more active during running ( p<.05). The cutting required certain knee flexors and hamstrings to exert greater forces to reduce knee joint loading during rotation, resulting in distinct differences in biomechanical variables and muscle recruitment patterns compared to running.

Korean Journal of Sports ScienceVol. 33(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.