Regional Growth Accounting Analysis and Its Implications

This study conducted Korean regional-level growth accounting analysis from early 2000s. The analysis finds that there had been two regional axes of Korea economic growth in early 2000s; Incheon-Gyeonggi-Chungnam area and Gyeongbuk-Gyeongnam-Busan-Jeonnam-Gwangju area, but in early 2020s, except several major (regional hub) cities, the axes of economic growth have been collapsed to a single area related to capital(Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Incheon) and nearby area(Chungbuk, Chungnam, etc.). This study’s finding implies that, regarding balanced regional development policy the aspect of ‘central vs south area’ is more appropriate than that of ‘capital versus non-capital area’. Also, the finding indicates the necessity of regional development policy focusing on the regional hub cities, showing higher total factor productivity growth compared to nearby regions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Institute for Future Growth
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29143/kuifg.2024.10.2.3
Primary Topic
Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional Growth Accounting Analysis and Its Implications

Juneyoung Lee
Institute for Future Growth
Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis
article

Regional Growth Accounting Analysis and Its Implications

Juneyoung Lee
article en

Abstract

This study conducted Korean regional-level growth accounting analysis from early 2000s. The analysis finds that there had been two regional axes of Korea economic growth in early 2000s; Incheon-Gyeonggi-Chungnam area and Gyeongbuk-Gyeongnam-Busan-Jeonnam-Gwangju area, but in early 2020s, except several major (regional hub) cities, the axes of economic growth have been collapsed to a single area related to capital(Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Incheon) and nearby area(Chungbuk, Chungnam, etc.). This study’s finding implies that, regarding balanced regional development policy the aspect of ‘central vs south area’ is more appropriate than that of ‘capital versus non-capital area’. Also, the finding indicates the necessity of regional development policy focusing on the regional hub cities, showing higher total factor productivity growth compared to nearby regions.

Institute for Future GrowthVol. 10(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Regional Growth Accounting Analysis and Its Implications — Juneyoung Lee · Institute for Future Growth (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS