Nudging: An experiment on transparency, accounting for reactance and response time

Is being informed about a nudge detrimental to its effect? This paper reports results from an experimental online study testing the effects of transparency on the effectiveness of a default nudge while accounting for psychological reactance and response time. Overall and in line with earlier studies, we find no negative effect of transparency on average behaviour. Adding to the previous discussion, we find that effects of transparency differ depending on response time. In particular, decision makers with longer response time in fact react more positively (keeping the default) if nudging is made transparent. Moreover, the data show an interaction of reactance and response time in that more reactant subjects with longer response time leave the default more often. Thus, a positive effect of transparency as well as a negative impact of reactance can be established in the data if response time is accounted for.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Psychology
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2025.102797
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nudging: An experiment on transparency, accounting for reactance and response time

Philipp C. Wichardt, Carsten Spitzer, Tobias Schütze
2 citations
Journal of Economic Psychology
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
4.54
article

Nudging: An experiment on transparency, accounting for reactance and response time

Philipp C. Wichardt, Carsten Spitzer, Tobias Schütze
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Is being informed about a nudge detrimental to its effect? This paper reports results from an experimental online study testing the effects of transparency on the effectiveness of a default nudge while accounting for psychological reactance and response time. Overall and in line with earlier studies, we find no negative effect of transparency on average behaviour. Adding to the previous discussion, we find that effects of transparency differ depending on response time. In particular, decision makers with longer response time in fact react more positively (keeping the default) if nudging is made transparent. Moreover, the data show an interaction of reactance and response time in that more reactant subjects with longer response time leave the default more often. Thus, a positive effect of transparency as well as a negative impact of reactance can be established in the data if response time is accounted for.

Journal of Economic PsychologyVol. 107
Kiel Institute for the World Economy (DE), Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE), Lund University (SE), University of Rostock (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
4.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nudging: An experiment on transparency, accounting for reactance and response time — Philipp C. Wichardt, Carsten Spitzer, et al. · Journal of Economic Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS