Decoding coopetition performance using impactful coopetition attributes: Evidence from manufacturing companies

The concept of coopetition - simultaneous collaboration and competition between organizations to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes - plays a pivotal role in shaping business performance, particularly during periods of rapid technological advancements. This is especially evident the manufacturing sector, where innovation and competitive dynamics intersect with economic and social forces. The current academic discourse predominantly focuses on the qualitative identification and analysis of coopetition attributes, leaving a significant gap for large-scale quantitative studies to enable empirical assessment. This study aims to examine the significance of three groups of coopetition attributes for coopetition performance classified into two strategic ( dynamics , paradoxicality ), six relational ( asymmetry , complexity , coopetition intensity , mutual dependence , strength , tensions ), and five behavioral attributes ( competition intensity , conflict , formality , investments , trust ). Using data from 1216 manufacturing firms in Poland and employing a generalized Covariance based Structural Equation Model (CB-SEM), this study offers nuanced insights to the global discourse at the intersection of technological change and social dynamics. The results indicate that the strategic attribute paradoxicality , the relational attribute strength , and most of the behavioral attributes ( trust, competition intensity, investments, formality ) positively impact coopetition performance. Additionally, a significant negative impact of the strategic attribute dynamics was demonstrated, while no significant influence was identified for the remaining relational attributes ( asymmetry, tensions ) as well as the behavioral attribute conflict . Diverging from prior qualitative approaches, this study offers data-driven insights for decision-makers navigating societal and technological change, highlighting which attributes should be stimulated to enhance coopetition performance while minimizing the level of dynamics within coopetition strategies. • Coopetition attributes can be clustered into behavioral, strategic and relational. • Coopetition attributes significantly impact coopetition performance in various ways. • Paradoxicality, strength and behavioral attributes positively impact performance. • Dynamics negatively impact coopetition performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology in Society
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102819
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Business Strategy and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding coopetition performance using impactful coopetition attributes: Evidence from manufacturing companies

Sylwia Stańczyk, Arkadiusz Kawa, Dominik K. Kanbach, Karina Sachpazidu-Wójcicka et al.
5 citations
Technology in Society
Business Strategy and Innovation
11.13
article

Decoding coopetition performance using impactful coopetition attributes: Evidence from manufacturing companies

Sylwia Stańczyk, Arkadiusz Kawa, Dominik K. Kanbach, Karina Sachpazidu-Wójcicka, Patrycja Klimas, Katharina Brenk
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The concept of coopetition - simultaneous collaboration and competition between organizations to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes - plays a pivotal role in shaping business performance, particularly during periods of rapid technological advancements. This is especially evident the manufacturing sector, where innovation and competitive dynamics intersect with economic and social forces. The current academic discourse predominantly focuses on the qualitative identification and analysis of coopetition attributes, leaving a significant gap for large-scale quantitative studies to enable empirical assessment. This study aims to examine the significance of three groups of coopetition attributes for coopetition performance classified into two strategic ( dynamics , paradoxicality ), six relational ( asymmetry , complexity , coopetition intensity , mutual dependence , strength , tensions ), and five behavioral attributes ( competition intensity , conflict , formality , investments , trust ). Using data from 1216 manufacturing firms in Poland and employing a generalized Covariance based Structural Equation Model (CB-SEM), this study offers nuanced insights to the global discourse at the intersection of technological change and social dynamics. The results indicate that the strategic attribute paradoxicality , the relational attribute strength , and most of the behavioral attributes ( trust, competition intensity, investments, formality ) positively impact coopetition performance. Additionally, a significant negative impact of the strategic attribute dynamics was demonstrated, while no significant influence was identified for the remaining relational attributes ( asymmetry, tensions ) as well as the behavioral attribute conflict . Diverging from prior qualitative approaches, this study offers data-driven insights for decision-makers navigating societal and technological change, highlighting which attributes should be stimulated to enhance coopetition performance while minimizing the level of dynamics within coopetition strategies. • Coopetition attributes can be clustered into behavioral, strategic and relational. • Coopetition attributes significantly impact coopetition performance in various ways. • Paradoxicality, strength and behavioral attributes positively impact performance. • Dynamics negatively impact coopetition performance.

Technology in SocietyVol. 81
Poznań University of Economics and Business (PL), HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management (DE), Wroclaw University of Economics and Business (PL), University of Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Business Strategy and Innovation
11.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.