A Comparative Analysis of Curricula of Companion Animal-related Departments in Four-Year Universities

The growth of the companion animal industry has led to a greater demand for skilled professionals. In response, this study aimed to compare and analyze the curricula and curriculum management of companion animal-related programs at three 4-year universities located in the Busan, Gyeongsang, and Jeolla regions. The findings are as follows: First, a comparison of the core curricula revealed that University A focuses on industrial design, while Universities B and C specialize in training animal health technicians, showing a difference in program emphasis. Second, the program competencies at University A are designed to produce companion animal industrial designers, while Universities B and C focus on preparing students to become animal health technicians. Third, an analysis of curriculum management showed differences between University A and the other two universities. This study is expected to offer valuable insights for the ongoing improvement and development of companion animal-related curricula. By actively integrating feedback and resolving areas for improvement, it will contribute to enhancing students' expertise and skills in the field. Ultimately, this will support the delivery of effective education that aligns with the evolving needs of the industry.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health and Beauty
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35131/ishb.2024.18.3_2.100
Primary Topic
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Curricula of Companion Animal-related Departments in Four-Year Universities

Jin-sook Gwak
Journal of Health and Beauty
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
article

A Comparative Analysis of Curricula of Companion Animal-related Departments in Four-Year Universities

Jin-sook Gwak
article en

Abstract

The growth of the companion animal industry has led to a greater demand for skilled professionals. In response, this study aimed to compare and analyze the curricula and curriculum management of companion animal-related programs at three 4-year universities located in the Busan, Gyeongsang, and Jeolla regions. The findings are as follows: First, a comparison of the core curricula revealed that University A focuses on industrial design, while Universities B and C specialize in training animal health technicians, showing a difference in program emphasis. Second, the program competencies at University A are designed to produce companion animal industrial designers, while Universities B and C focus on preparing students to become animal health technicians. Third, an analysis of curriculum management showed differences between University A and the other two universities. This study is expected to offer valuable insights for the ongoing improvement and development of companion animal-related curricula. By actively integrating feedback and resolving areas for improvement, it will contribute to enhancing students' expertise and skills in the field. Ultimately, this will support the delivery of effective education that aligns with the evolving needs of the industry.

Journal of Health and BeautyVol. 18(3_2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.