Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Early Enteral Feeding Versus Total Parenteral Nutrition in Postoperative Recovery Following Major Abdominal Surgery A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Complications

This meta-analysis investigates the comparative effectiveness and safety of early enteral feeding (EEN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in postoperative recovery following major abdominal surgeries, including gastrointestinal resections, esophagectomies, and cystectomies. A systematic review of 12 studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and secondary analyses published from 2014 to 2024, was conducted. The primary outcomes analyzed were hospital stay duration, complication rates, and nutritional status, while secondary outcomes included gastrointestinal recovery, immune function, and cost-effectiveness. The results revealed that EEN significantly outperformed TPN in several key areas. EEN was associated with a shorter hospital stay (mean reduction of 2.1 days), fewer infectious complications (risk ratio [RR] 0.68), and reduced pulmonary complications (RR 0.60). Nutritionally, patients in the EEN group exhibited improved outcomes, including higher serum albumin levels (mean difference 0.42 g/dL) and less weight loss (-1.1 kg) compared to those receiving TPN. Additionally, EEN promoted faster gastrointestinal recovery (mean difference of -1.4 days) and improved immune function. Subgroup analyses highlighted the particular advantages of EEN in gastrointestinal and gastric cancer surgeries, where it facilitated quicker recovery and fewer complications. There were no significant differences in mortality rates between the two feeding strategies. Sensitivity and heterogeneity assessments confirmed the robustness of the findings, although moderate risk of bias was observed in some studies. This meta-analysis supports the use of EEN over TPN in postoperative nutritional support, offering better clinical outcomes, faster recovery, and fewer complications, making it a more effective and cost-efficient approach in major abdominal surgeries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i1.468
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Early Enteral Feeding Versus Total Parenteral Nutrition in Postoperative Recovery Following Major Abdominal Surgery A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Complications

Uzair Khan, Muhammad Waqas, Saad Akhtar Khan, Siddiq Akbar et al.
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
article

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Early Enteral Feeding Versus Total Parenteral Nutrition in Postoperative Recovery Following Major Abdominal Surgery A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Complications

Uzair Khan, Muhammad Waqas, Saad Akhtar Khan, Siddiq Akbar, Abdul Waqar Khan, Samia Ejaz, Aroosha Akbar, Omair Qaseem
article en

Abstract

This meta-analysis investigates the comparative effectiveness and safety of early enteral feeding (EEN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in postoperative recovery following major abdominal surgeries, including gastrointestinal resections, esophagectomies, and cystectomies. A systematic review of 12 studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and secondary analyses published from 2014 to 2024, was conducted. The primary outcomes analyzed were hospital stay duration, complication rates, and nutritional status, while secondary outcomes included gastrointestinal recovery, immune function, and cost-effectiveness. The results revealed that EEN significantly outperformed TPN in several key areas. EEN was associated with a shorter hospital stay (mean reduction of 2.1 days), fewer infectious complications (risk ratio [RR] 0.68), and reduced pulmonary complications (RR 0.60). Nutritionally, patients in the EEN group exhibited improved outcomes, including higher serum albumin levels (mean difference 0.42 g/dL) and less weight loss (-1.1 kg) compared to those receiving TPN. Additionally, EEN promoted faster gastrointestinal recovery (mean difference of -1.4 days) and improved immune function. Subgroup analyses highlighted the particular advantages of EEN in gastrointestinal and gastric cancer surgeries, where it facilitated quicker recovery and fewer complications. There were no significant differences in mortality rates between the two feeding strategies. Sensitivity and heterogeneity assessments confirmed the robustness of the findings, although moderate risk of bias was observed in some studies. This meta-analysis supports the use of EEN over TPN in postoperative nutritional support, offering better clinical outcomes, faster recovery, and fewer complications, making it a more effective and cost-efficient approach in major abdominal surgeries.

Indus journal of bioscience research.Vol. 3(1)
Lady Reading Hospital (PK), Combined Military Hospital (PK), Hayatabad Medical Complex (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.