Industrial Distraction

Abstract There are myriad techniques industry actors use to shape the public understanding of science. While a naive view might assume these techniques typically involve fraud or outright deception, the truth is more nuanced. This paper analyzes industrial distraction, a common technique where industry actors fund and share research that is accurate, often high-quality, but nonetheless misleading on important matters of fact. This involves reshaping causal understanding of phenomena with distracting information. Using case studies and causal models, we illustrate how this impacts belief and decision making even for rational learners, informing science policy and debates about misleading content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2025.1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Industrial Distraction

Cailin O’Connor, D. Freeborn
3 citations
Philosophy of Science
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
8.29
article

Industrial Distraction

Cailin O’Connor, D. Freeborn
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract There are myriad techniques industry actors use to shape the public understanding of science. While a naive view might assume these techniques typically involve fraud or outright deception, the truth is more nuanced. This paper analyzes industrial distraction, a common technique where industry actors fund and share research that is accurate, often high-quality, but nonetheless misleading on important matters of fact. This involves reshaping causal understanding of phenomena with distracting information. Using case studies and causal models, we illustrate how this impacts belief and decision making even for rational learners, informing science policy and debates about misleading content.

Philosophy of ScienceVol. 92(3)
University of California, Irvine (US), University of California System (US), Universidad del Noreste (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
8.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.