The Right to a Public Hearing in the Era of the COVID-19 Epidemic – Selected Issues

The article is devoted to the subject analysis of the constitutional regulation of the right to court as regards the right to a public hearing in judicial-administrative and civil cases on the basis of the regulation that was in force during the state of epidemic and state of epidemic emergency in connection with the COVID-19 disease. The aim of the study is an attempt to assess the constitutionality of the regulation occurring in civil proceedings and the regulation occurring in judicial-administrative proceedings, according to which, still within one year from the date of cancellation of the state of epidemics, or the state of epidemic threat, the Supreme Administrative Court could consider appeals in closed sessions – not being bound by the application of the parties. The author tries to show that the regulation in question did not meet the requirements of the institution of the right to court. The text assesses the proportionality of such a regulation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17951/ppa.2024.8.49-61
Primary Topic
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Right to a Public Hearing in the Era of the COVID-19 Epidemic – Selected Issues

Aleksander Hyżorek
Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
article

The Right to a Public Hearing in the Era of the COVID-19 Epidemic – Selected Issues

Aleksander Hyżorek
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the subject analysis of the constitutional regulation of the right to court as regards the right to a public hearing in judicial-administrative and civil cases on the basis of the regulation that was in force during the state of epidemic and state of epidemic emergency in connection with the COVID-19 disease. The aim of the study is an attempt to assess the constitutionality of the regulation occurring in civil proceedings and the regulation occurring in judicial-administrative proceedings, according to which, still within one year from the date of cancellation of the state of epidemics, or the state of epidemic threat, the Supreme Administrative Court could consider appeals in closed sessions – not being bound by the application of the parties. The author tries to show that the regulation in question did not meet the requirements of the institution of the right to court. The text assesses the proportionality of such a regulation.

Przegląd Prawa AdministracyjnegoVol. 8
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.