The Concept of a Witness: Comparative Law Observations

Being a witness in a case that is the subject of court or administrative proceedings entails significant procedural consequences for such a person, especially related to the prohibition of combining specific procedural roles and the obligation to appear when summoned. For this reason, it is extremely important to precisely determine what features or events determine whether a given entity has the status of a witness. However, the term “witness” does not have one, universal meaning in Polish. First of all, there is the concept of a witness in the factual sense and the concept of a witness in the legal sense. Furthermore, a witness in the legal sense is not a uniform institution, because legal regulations allow us to distinguish between an active witness and a passive witness, whose procedural functions are completely different. Even the referents of the name “active witness” have different constitutive features depending on the branch of procedural law. Regardless of this, within the criminal procedure itself, there are special categories of active witnesses, with specific rights and obligations or modes of examining: incognito witness, state’s evidence and injured party.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17951/ppa.2024.8.79-98
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Comparative and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Concept of a Witness: Comparative Law Observations

Zbigniew R. Kmiecik
1 citations
Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego
Comparative and International Law Studies
4.07
article

The Concept of a Witness: Comparative Law Observations

Zbigniew R. Kmiecik
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Being a witness in a case that is the subject of court or administrative proceedings entails significant procedural consequences for such a person, especially related to the prohibition of combining specific procedural roles and the obligation to appear when summoned. For this reason, it is extremely important to precisely determine what features or events determine whether a given entity has the status of a witness. However, the term “witness” does not have one, universal meaning in Polish. First of all, there is the concept of a witness in the factual sense and the concept of a witness in the legal sense. Furthermore, a witness in the legal sense is not a uniform institution, because legal regulations allow us to distinguish between an active witness and a passive witness, whose procedural functions are completely different. Even the referents of the name “active witness” have different constitutive features depending on the branch of procedural law. Regardless of this, within the criminal procedure itself, there are special categories of active witnesses, with specific rights and obligations or modes of examining: incognito witness, state’s evidence and injured party.

Przegląd Prawa AdministracyjnegoVol. 8
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Comparative and International Law Studies
4.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Concept of a Witness: Comparative Law Observations — Zbigniew R. Kmiecik · Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS