Lücke, Felix (2024). Nicht kodifizierte Regeln im Deutschen Bundestag. Eine empirische und rechtssystematische Studie über das informale Parlament. Duncker & Humblot 2024 (Beiträge zum Parlamentsrecht, Band 87), 563 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-428-19101-7

Parliaments cannot function solely based on their legal regulations. Informal rules are also necessary for situations that are not meant to be formally regulated, allowing for a degree of flexibility within parliamentary organization and operations. Felix Lücke thoroughly examines this other side of the coin and provides a systematic legal classification of it. Certain “practices” that are generally perceived as fair can foster trust among representatives and factions, as well as between the majority and minority. If parliamentary customs are rigorously rejected by parties that have recently entered the parliament, it not only jeopardizes the working atmosphere but also the overall functionality of the parliament.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy Recht und Management
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v17i2.15
Primary Topic
Public Administration and Political Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lücke, Felix (2024). Nicht kodifizierte Regeln im Deutschen Bundestag. Eine empirische und rechtssystematische Studie über das informale Parlament. Duncker & Humblot 2024 (Beiträge zum Parlamentsrecht, Band 87), 563 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-428-19101-7

Göttrik Wewer
dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy Recht und Management
Public Administration and Political Analysis
article

Lücke, Felix (2024). Nicht kodifizierte Regeln im Deutschen Bundestag. Eine empirische und rechtssystematische Studie über das informale Parlament. Duncker & Humblot 2024 (Beiträge zum Parlamentsrecht, Band 87), 563 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-428-19101-7

Göttrik Wewer
article en

Abstract

Parliaments cannot function solely based on their legal regulations. Informal rules are also necessary for situations that are not meant to be formally regulated, allowing for a degree of flexibility within parliamentary organization and operations. Felix Lücke thoroughly examines this other side of the coin and provides a systematic legal classification of it. Certain “practices” that are generally perceived as fair can foster trust among representatives and factions, as well as between the majority and minority. If parliamentary customs are rigorously rejected by parties that have recently entered the parliament, it not only jeopardizes the working atmosphere but also the overall functionality of the parliament.

dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy Recht und ManagementVol. 17(2-2024)
Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Public Administration and Political Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.