Anthropometric Assessment of Classroom Furniture for Ghanaian School Children From Two Socio-Economic Areas

<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>Children spend over 80% of their school time in a seated position yet, ergonomic principles are conservatively applied in adult workplaces without consideration for the school environment. This study assessed the compatibility of the school furniture of kindergarten and class one pupil in the Asokore Mampong and Oforikrom Municipalities, Ghana.</p> <p> A cross-sectional analytic study was used. The research covered four selected basic schools from two socioeconomic suburbs (relatively high and relatively low socioeconomic areas).</p> <p>The participants were chosen using stratified sampling. Anthropometric data were collected from 395 healthy pupils during regular class lessons. The student furniture dimensions were taken and compared with their anthropometry to identify potential matches or mismatches. For all sitting anthropometric parameters, students were seated in an upright position with 90º knees and elbow flexion.</p> <p>The findings revealed a considerable level of discordancy between the measured furniture and the anthropometrics of the learners due to the negligence of user anthropometry during the construction of educational furniture. The seat depth was too deep for 80.51% of participants, only 15.19% had appropriate seat depth. The seat-to-desk height had a 25.06% match, 69.11% low mismatch, and 5.82% high mismatch. The match percentages of seat desk clearance, seat width, and desk depth were 72.91%, 66.08%, and 36.46% respectively. The match percentages of seat height were 24.61% for low socio-economic area schools and 12.25% for high socio-economic area schools. The seat height was too low for 45.55% of pupils from low socio-economic area schools and 62.25% of those from high socio-economic area schools. The seat depth was too deep for 91.62% of pupils from low socio-economic area schools and 70.10% of pupils from high socio-economic area schools.</p> <p>The study revealed considerable incompatibility between the classroom furniture and the body dimensions of the pupils. Thus, the classroom furniture requires ergonomic improvements.</p> <p><strong>Keywords:</strong> anthropometry; furniture dimensions; ergonomic problems; school children.</p>

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF MEDICINE CARE AND HEALTH REVIEW
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61615/jmchr/2025/jan027140116
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anthropometric Assessment of Classroom Furniture for Ghanaian School Children From Two Socio-Economic Areas

1 citations
JOURNAL OF MEDICINE CARE AND HEALTH REVIEW
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
2.44
article

Anthropometric Assessment of Classroom Furniture for Ghanaian School Children From Two Socio-Economic Areas

article en
1 citations

Abstract

<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>Children spend over 80% of their school time in a seated position yet, ergonomic principles are conservatively applied in adult workplaces without consideration for the school environment. This study assessed the compatibility of the school furniture of kindergarten and class one pupil in the Asokore Mampong and Oforikrom Municipalities, Ghana.</p> <p> A cross-sectional analytic study was used. The research covered four selected basic schools from two socioeconomic suburbs (relatively high and relatively low socioeconomic areas).</p> <p>The participants were chosen using stratified sampling. Anthropometric data were collected from 395 healthy pupils during regular class lessons. The student furniture dimensions were taken and compared with their anthropometry to identify potential matches or mismatches. For all sitting anthropometric parameters, students were seated in an upright position with 90º knees and elbow flexion.</p> <p>The findings revealed a considerable level of discordancy between the measured furniture and the anthropometrics of the learners due to the negligence of user anthropometry during the construction of educational furniture. The seat depth was too deep for 80.51% of participants, only 15.19% had appropriate seat depth. The seat-to-desk height had a 25.06% match, 69.11% low mismatch, and 5.82% high mismatch. The match percentages of seat desk clearance, seat width, and desk depth were 72.91%, 66.08%, and 36.46% respectively. The match percentages of seat height were 24.61% for low socio-economic area schools and 12.25% for high socio-economic area schools. The seat height was too low for 45.55% of pupils from low socio-economic area schools and 62.25% of those from high socio-economic area schools. The seat depth was too deep for 91.62% of pupils from low socio-economic area schools and 70.10% of pupils from high socio-economic area schools.</p> <p>The study revealed considerable incompatibility between the classroom furniture and the body dimensions of the pupils. Thus, the classroom furniture requires ergonomic improvements.</p> <p><strong>Keywords:</strong> anthropometry; furniture dimensions; ergonomic problems; school children.</p>

JOURNAL OF MEDICINE CARE AND HEALTH REVIEW
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Anthropometric Assessment of Classroom Furniture for Ghanaian School Children From Two Socio-Economic Areas · JOURNAL OF MEDICINE CARE AND HEALTH REVIEW (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS