Europhobia as a trajectory to hate speech normalisation? A diachronic analysis of Brexit media propaganda

This article provides a diachronic analysis of how Europhobic discourses (with particular reference to Brexit) have emerged, consolidated and normalised in the British public sphere (media, institutions and the networked public). Identifying a discursive chain of legitimacy articulated in three interrelated phases (pre-legitimation, institutionalisation and normalisation) this article suggests that the legacy of Brexit can be found in a normalisation of exclusionary discourses which could have also become the rational basis for legitimising further discrimination in a self-reinforcing logic. By taking a diachronic approach, this article makes the case for analysing discriminatory discourses from ‘chained’ and diachronic perspectives to capture social dynamics beyond the normative aspect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Discourse Studies
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2024.2446943
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
42.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Europhobia as a trajectory to hate speech normalisation? A diachronic analysis of Brexit media propaganda

Franco Zappettini
5 citations
Critical Discourse Studies
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
42.61
article

Europhobia as a trajectory to hate speech normalisation? A diachronic analysis of Brexit media propaganda

Franco Zappettini
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This article provides a diachronic analysis of how Europhobic discourses (with particular reference to Brexit) have emerged, consolidated and normalised in the British public sphere (media, institutions and the networked public). Identifying a discursive chain of legitimacy articulated in three interrelated phases (pre-legitimation, institutionalisation and normalisation) this article suggests that the legacy of Brexit can be found in a normalisation of exclusionary discourses which could have also become the rational basis for legitimising further discrimination in a self-reinforcing logic. By taking a diachronic approach, this article makes the case for analysing discriminatory discourses from ‘chained’ and diachronic perspectives to capture social dynamics beyond the normative aspect.

Critical Discourse Studies
University of Liverpool (GB), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
42.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.