Чии са тълкуванията в Слово 32 на Учителното евангелие?

The article is dedicated to Oration 32 of Constantine of Preslav’s Uchitelno Evangelie (‘Didactic Gospel’). In all four Slavonic copies of this written monument, the name of Cyrill of Alexandria appears in the title, thus attributing to him the authorship of the commentaries that make up the middle section of the sermon. In it, the commentary on Lk 16:19–31 is translated, which is part of the catena on Luke Type A CPG/ClaCla C130.1 (catena prima, die Grundform). In most Byzantine manuscripts witnessing this catena, there is an attribution Κυρίλλου in the margins to one of the opening passages. A comparison with catenae of other types further reveals the names of John Chrysostom and Isidore of Pelusiot. On the basis of the analysis, into which the Syriac translation of Cyril of Alexandria’s Homilies 111 and 112 and John Chrysostom’s Conciones de Lazaro are also included, the boundaries of the fragments stemming from individual authors compiled in the anonymous commentary of CPG/ClaCla C130.1 are established. It becomes clear that the majority of the commentaries included in Orations 32 are in fact excerpts from John Chrysostom’s Conciones de Lazaro, 1ؘ–4. The comparison between the various catenae also seems to indicate their dependence on a common archetype.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Palaeobulgarica
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59076/2603-2899.2024.4.01
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Чии са тълкуванията в Слово 32 на Учителното евангелие?

Добриела Котова
Palaeobulgarica
Byzantine Studies and History
article

Чии са тълкуванията в Слово 32 на Учителното евангелие?

Добриела Котова
article en

Abstract

The article is dedicated to Oration 32 of Constantine of Preslav’s Uchitelno Evangelie (‘Didactic Gospel’). In all four Slavonic copies of this written monument, the name of Cyrill of Alexandria appears in the title, thus attributing to him the authorship of the commentaries that make up the middle section of the sermon. In it, the commentary on Lk 16:19–31 is translated, which is part of the catena on Luke Type A CPG/ClaCla C130.1 (catena prima, die Grundform). In most Byzantine manuscripts witnessing this catena, there is an attribution Κυρίλλου in the margins to one of the opening passages. A comparison with catenae of other types further reveals the names of John Chrysostom and Isidore of Pelusiot. On the basis of the analysis, into which the Syriac translation of Cyril of Alexandria’s Homilies 111 and 112 and John Chrysostom’s Conciones de Lazaro are also included, the boundaries of the fragments stemming from individual authors compiled in the anonymous commentary of CPG/ClaCla C130.1 are established. It becomes clear that the majority of the commentaries included in Orations 32 are in fact excerpts from John Chrysostom’s Conciones de Lazaro, 1ؘ–4. The comparison between the various catenae also seems to indicate their dependence on a common archetype.

PalaeobulgaricaVol. 48(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.