Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments

Students have personal experience adjusting to face-to-face and virtual learning in any hybrid teaching and learning activity. In a hybrid classroom, engagement is always emphasised as a significant factor in academic achievement. Nevertheless, their engagement is expected to be inconsistent, particularly since they face challenges coping with the changes in the learning environment. With technology-based learning environments, the learning environments is a lot more technology-based. Investigating student engagement provides guidelines for monitoring the student’s direction in the learning process. Hence, this study examined how students react in a hybrid class. A causal-comparison research design was employed between hybrid face-to-face and online environments, comparing engagement guides to determine which environment promotes more positive engagement. A random sample was collected to generalise university students’ learning in a hybrid environment. Overall, students in a face-to-face environment showed relatively higher engagement (mean = 3.9730) than students in a virtual environment (mean = 3.770). They demonstrated relatively high-performance engagement (mean = 4.1626) and skill engagement (mean = 4.0244). Even though the result showed no significant difference in overall engagement between the two groups, further analysis showed a significant difference in performance engagement, indicating that the face-to-face group showed significantly higher performance engagement than the virtual group. The correlation analyses revealed a relationship between the engagement constructs, indicating participation has a higher correlation with emotion (in the face-to-face environment) and skill (in the virtual environment). The correlation results revealed a significant contribution from participation engagement, even though it has the lowest value in the descriptive statistics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2451497
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
44.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments

Parmjit Singh, Nurshamshida Md Shamsudin, Teoh Sian Hoon, Rudi Hartono et al.
5 citations
Cogent Education
Online and Blended Learning
44.63
article

Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments

Parmjit Singh, Nurshamshida Md Shamsudin, Teoh Sian Hoon, Rudi Hartono, Joseph Boon Zik Hong
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Students have personal experience adjusting to face-to-face and virtual learning in any hybrid teaching and learning activity. In a hybrid classroom, engagement is always emphasised as a significant factor in academic achievement. Nevertheless, their engagement is expected to be inconsistent, particularly since they face challenges coping with the changes in the learning environment. With technology-based learning environments, the learning environments is a lot more technology-based. Investigating student engagement provides guidelines for monitoring the student’s direction in the learning process. Hence, this study examined how students react in a hybrid class. A causal-comparison research design was employed between hybrid face-to-face and online environments, comparing engagement guides to determine which environment promotes more positive engagement. A random sample was collected to generalise university students’ learning in a hybrid environment. Overall, students in a face-to-face environment showed relatively higher engagement (mean = 3.9730) than students in a virtual environment (mean = 3.770). They demonstrated relatively high-performance engagement (mean = 4.1626) and skill engagement (mean = 4.0244). Even though the result showed no significant difference in overall engagement between the two groups, further analysis showed a significant difference in performance engagement, indicating that the face-to-face group showed significantly higher performance engagement than the virtual group. The correlation analyses revealed a relationship between the engagement constructs, indicating participation has a higher correlation with emotion (in the face-to-face environment) and skill (in the virtual environment). The correlation results revealed a significant contribution from participation engagement, even though it has the lowest value in the descriptive statistics.

Cogent EducationVol. 12(1)
State University of Semarang (ID), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Universiti Teknologi MARA
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Online and Blended Learning
44.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.