An Assessment of Blended Short Loop Recycled Graphite Electrodes Using X‐Ray Micro‐Computed Tomography

Abstract With various battery directives necessitating the composition of recycled electrode materials this study manufactures anodes containing various ratios of pristine and reclaimed graphite from end‐of‐life (EOL) cells. Two approaches that can be used to delaminate graphite are using ultrasonication (USD) and simple water delamination (WD). X‐ray micro‐computed tomography is used to characterize the graphite particles and show that particle fracturing is evident with both methods, but key structural metrics such as particle radius and diffusivity varied significantly. It is shown that blending 20% recovers material with 80% pristine graphite causes no statistically significant difference in the performance of the cells. This suggests that recycling anode materials can be achieved without significant post‐processing required. For WD anode material, the spherical graphite particles are maintained, whereas USD significantly changes the morphology and produces a large amount of “needle‐like” particles. Using 100% reclaimed anode material causes the performance of the cell to decrease to 279 mAh g −1 for WD material and 254 mAh g −1 for USD graphite. The use of “blended” electrodes using WD graphite and pristine material creates electrodes with a comparable Li + flux and electrochemical performance to a pristine graphite reference of 300–315 mAh g −1 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Energy Materials
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202403498
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Assessment of Blended Short Loop Recycled Graphite Electrodes Using X‐Ray Micro‐Computed Tomography

Sean Scott, Paul Robert Shearing, Chunhong Lei, Andrew P. Abbott et al.
3 citations
Advanced Energy Materials
Extraction and Separation Processes
2.14
article

An Assessment of Blended Short Loop Recycled Graphite Electrodes Using X‐Ray Micro‐Computed Tomography

Sean Scott, Paul Robert Shearing, Chunhong Lei, Andrew P. Abbott, Wenjia Du, Rosie Horwood
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract With various battery directives necessitating the composition of recycled electrode materials this study manufactures anodes containing various ratios of pristine and reclaimed graphite from end‐of‐life (EOL) cells. Two approaches that can be used to delaminate graphite are using ultrasonication (USD) and simple water delamination (WD). X‐ray micro‐computed tomography is used to characterize the graphite particles and show that particle fracturing is evident with both methods, but key structural metrics such as particle radius and diffusivity varied significantly. It is shown that blending 20% recovers material with 80% pristine graphite causes no statistically significant difference in the performance of the cells. This suggests that recycling anode materials can be achieved without significant post‐processing required. For WD anode material, the spherical graphite particles are maintained, whereas USD significantly changes the morphology and produces a large amount of “needle‐like” particles. Using 100% reclaimed anode material causes the performance of the cell to decrease to 279 mAh g −1 for WD material and 254 mAh g −1 for USD graphite. The use of “blended” electrodes using WD graphite and pristine material creates electrodes with a comparable Li + flux and electrochemical performance to a pristine graphite reference of 300–315 mAh g −1 .

Advanced Energy MaterialsVol. 15(20)
University of Leicester (GB), University of Oxford (GB), The Faraday Institution (GB)
Faraday Institution, Royal Academy of Engineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Extraction and Separation Processes
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.