Guided self-help for Bulimia Nervosa: A comparison of individual and group provision

This service evaluation explores the implementation of Guided Self-Help (GSH), the first line recommended treatment for Bulimia Nervosa, in both individual and group formats, in an NHS community eating disorder service. The study aimed to examine the effectiveness of GSH, compare this across treatment modalities, and explore the therapy experience of participants. N=23 participants engaged in individual and n=38 engaged in group treatment. Three outcome measures (EDE-Q, CIA and PHQ-9) were administered pre- and post-treatment. For both treatment modalities, post-intervention scores significantly improved on all outcome measures. In comparison, the individual treatment modality was found to be more effective for those with more extensive depressive symptoms. The study suggested that both individual and group GSH interventions are effective, supporting group implementation within community eating disorder services. It may be that those with more extensive depression symptoms would benefit to a greater extent from the individual intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychology Forum
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2024.1.383.19
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guided self-help for Bulimia Nervosa: A comparison of individual and group provision

Charlotte L. Rose, Paul D. White, Sanni Norweg, Rebecca Mueller et al.
Clinical Psychology Forum
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Guided self-help for Bulimia Nervosa: A comparison of individual and group provision

Charlotte L. Rose, Paul D. White, Sanni Norweg, Rebecca Mueller, Chloe Webster
article en

Abstract

This service evaluation explores the implementation of Guided Self-Help (GSH), the first line recommended treatment for Bulimia Nervosa, in both individual and group formats, in an NHS community eating disorder service. The study aimed to examine the effectiveness of GSH, compare this across treatment modalities, and explore the therapy experience of participants. N=23 participants engaged in individual and n=38 engaged in group treatment. Three outcome measures (EDE-Q, CIA and PHQ-9) were administered pre- and post-treatment. For both treatment modalities, post-intervention scores significantly improved on all outcome measures. In comparison, the individual treatment modality was found to be more effective for those with more extensive depressive symptoms. The study suggested that both individual and group GSH interventions are effective, supporting group implementation within community eating disorder services. It may be that those with more extensive depression symptoms would benefit to a greater extent from the individual intervention.

Clinical Psychology ForumVol. 1(383)
North Bristol NHS Trust (GB), University of the West of England (GB), University of Exeter (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Guided self-help for Bulimia Nervosa: A comparison of individual and group provision — Charlotte L. Rose, Paul D. White, et al. · Clinical Psychology Forum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS