Transparent Reflexivity: How to Exude Neutrality and Navigate Gatekeeping Through Shifting Positionality?

Gaining access to interviewees when carrying out qualitative research is a time-consuming, challenging undertaking.When face to face with gatekeepers, the work of convincing them to share their contacts and knowledge is not over, particularly when the research involves antagonistic groups and the researcher's positionality can be scrutinized in relation to that.In this article, based on my field work on hydraulic fracturing and its socioenvironmental impacts in Appalachia, I explore how my positionality shifted while being vouched for by funders and industry representatives.Additionally, I show how being probed due to my institutional affiliation, origin, and disciplinary background required me to strive to be perceived as neutral, in direct opposition to my feminist ethics, for the sake of ingratiating myself with gatekeepers.I problematize how this behavior was necessary as a first-year untenured faculty in the context of neoliberal academia, where I had to ensure meeting the funders' expectations and paving the way for potential future additional funding and job security.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Professional Geographer
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2024.2447590
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transparent Reflexivity: How to Exude Neutrality and Navigate Gatekeeping Through Shifting Positionality?

Martina Angela Caretta
6 citations
The Professional Geographer
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
25.21
article

Transparent Reflexivity: How to Exude Neutrality and Navigate Gatekeeping Through Shifting Positionality?

Martina Angela Caretta
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Gaining access to interviewees when carrying out qualitative research is a time-consuming, challenging undertaking.When face to face with gatekeepers, the work of convincing them to share their contacts and knowledge is not over, particularly when the research involves antagonistic groups and the researcher's positionality can be scrutinized in relation to that.In this article, based on my field work on hydraulic fracturing and its socioenvironmental impacts in Appalachia, I explore how my positionality shifted while being vouched for by funders and industry representatives.Additionally, I show how being probed due to my institutional affiliation, origin, and disciplinary background required me to strive to be perceived as neutral, in direct opposition to my feminist ethics, for the sake of ingratiating myself with gatekeepers.I problematize how this behavior was necessary as a first-year untenured faculty in the context of neoliberal academia, where I had to ensure meeting the funders' expectations and paving the way for potential future additional funding and job security.

The Professional GeographerVol. 77(2)
Lund University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
25.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.