Collaborating for Change? Assessing Metadata Inclusivity in Digital Collections with Large Language Models (LLMs)

This research explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) can be contribute to human expertise and ethical judgment to support reparative archival description practices. We assess the interpretive abilities of three LLMs (Command R+, GPT-3.5 Turbo, and GPT-4o Mini) in assisting humans with metadata inclusivity evaluations. Our testbed comprises a small metadata subset (369 records) from the Robert Langmuir African-American Photograph Collection at Emory University. Despite limited task-specific training and no access to the digital objects associated with the metadata, the LLMs demonstrated notable capacity in identifying gaps, harmful language, and latent contextual elements. By integrating computational methods into descriptive workflows, this research advances Computational Archival Science (CAS), demonstrating how LLMs can enable connecting computational techniques with archival practices in tackling complex, human values-driven challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825858
Primary Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaborating for Change? Assessing Metadata Inclusivity in Digital Collections with Large Language Models (LLMs)

Elizabeth Russey Roke, Giulia Osti
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
article

Collaborating for Change? Assessing Metadata Inclusivity in Digital Collections with Large Language Models (LLMs)

Elizabeth Russey Roke, Giulia Osti
article en

Abstract

This research explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) can be contribute to human expertise and ethical judgment to support reparative archival description practices. We assess the interpretive abilities of three LLMs (Command R+, GPT-3.5 Turbo, and GPT-4o Mini) in assisting humans with metadata inclusivity evaluations. Our testbed comprises a small metadata subset (369 records) from the Robert Langmuir African-American Photograph Collection at Emory University. Despite limited task-specific training and no access to the digital objects associated with the metadata, the LLMs demonstrated notable capacity in identifying gaps, harmful language, and latent contextual elements. By integrating computational methods into descriptive workflows, this research advances Computational Archival Science (CAS), demonstrating how LLMs can enable connecting computational techniques with archival practices in tackling complex, human values-driven challenges.

University College Dublin (IE), Emory University (US)
Science Foundation Ireland
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Collaborating for Change? Assessing Metadata Inclusivity in Digital Collections with Large Language Models (LLMs) — Elizabeth Russey Roke, Giulia Osti · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS