Effective Guidance for Model Attention with Simple Yes-no Annotations

Modern deep learning models often make predictions by focusing on irrelevant areas, leading to biased performance and limited generalization. Existing methods aimed at rectifying model attention require explicit labels for irrelevant areas or complex pixel-wise ground truth attention maps. We present Crayon (Correcting Reasoning with Annotations of Yes Or No), offering effective, scalable, and practical solutions to rectify model attention using simple yes-no annotations. Crayon empowers classical and modern model interpretation techniques to identify and guide model reasoning: Crayon-Attention directs classic interpretations based on saliency maps to focus on relevant image regions, while Crayon-Pruning removes irrelevant neurons identified by modern concept-based methods to mitigate their influence. Through extensive experiments with both quantitative and human evaluation, we showcase Crayon’s effectiveness, scalability, and practicality in refining model attention. Crayon achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming 12 methods across 3 benchmark datasets, surpassing approaches that require more complex annotations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825776
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effective Guidance for Model Attention with Simple Yes-no Annotations

Duen Horng Chau, Ali Payani, Seongmin Lee
Topic Modeling
article

Effective Guidance for Model Attention with Simple Yes-no Annotations

Duen Horng Chau, Ali Payani, Seongmin Lee
article en

Abstract

Modern deep learning models often make predictions by focusing on irrelevant areas, leading to biased performance and limited generalization. Existing methods aimed at rectifying model attention require explicit labels for irrelevant areas or complex pixel-wise ground truth attention maps. We present Crayon (Correcting Reasoning with Annotations of Yes Or No), offering effective, scalable, and practical solutions to rectify model attention using simple yes-no annotations. Crayon empowers classical and modern model interpretation techniques to identify and guide model reasoning: Crayon-Attention directs classic interpretations based on saliency maps to focus on relevant image regions, while Crayon-Pruning removes irrelevant neurons identified by modern concept-based methods to mitigate their influence. Through extensive experiments with both quantitative and human evaluation, we showcase Crayon’s effectiveness, scalability, and practicality in refining model attention. Crayon achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming 12 methods across 3 benchmark datasets, surpassing approaches that require more complex annotations.

Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Cisco Systems (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effective Guidance for Model Attention with Simple Yes-no Annotations — Duen Horng Chau, Ali Payani, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS