Examining the Feasibility of Large Language Models as Survey Respondents

This study examines the potential of large language models (LLMs) to substitute for human respondents in survey research. Surveys serve as essential tools in fields like social science, marketing, and policy-making; however, traditional methods often require considerable time and costs. LLMs present a promising alternative to mitigate these burdens, though their reliability—particularly outside of U.S. contexts—remains uncertain. This study focuses on surveys conducted in Japan, comparing the responses generated by LLMs to those of actual Japanese participants. Our analysis reveals notable discrepancies due to inherent biases in LLMs, though adjusting the models to better align with specific personas can partially enhance the accuracy of simulated responses. We emphasize the need for further research to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of LLMs, aiming to refine their application in diverse areas such as social sciences, marketing, and policy decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825497
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Feasibility of Large Language Models as Survey Respondents

Kazuhito Ogawa, Nariaki Nishino, Ayato Kitadai
3 citations
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
3.40
article

Examining the Feasibility of Large Language Models as Survey Respondents

Kazuhito Ogawa, Nariaki Nishino, Ayato Kitadai
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study examines the potential of large language models (LLMs) to substitute for human respondents in survey research. Surveys serve as essential tools in fields like social science, marketing, and policy-making; however, traditional methods often require considerable time and costs. LLMs present a promising alternative to mitigate these burdens, though their reliability—particularly outside of U.S. contexts—remains uncertain. This study focuses on surveys conducted in Japan, comparing the responses generated by LLMs to those of actual Japanese participants. Our analysis reveals notable discrepancies due to inherent biases in LLMs, though adjusting the models to better align with specific personas can partially enhance the accuracy of simulated responses. We emphasize the need for further research to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of LLMs, aiming to refine their application in diverse areas such as social sciences, marketing, and policy decision-making.

Kansai University (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.