Empowering Data Science Teams: How Automation Frameworks Address Competency Gaps Across Project Lifecycles

In the fast-evolving field of data science, the combination of the right team competencies has a major impact on a successful project execution. These competencies, ranging from data acquisition to model deployment, are increasingly difficult to maintain due to widespread competency shortages. This puts data science projects at risk of delays, inefficiencies, and failure, as organizations struggle to find skilled professionals. Automation frameworks - software tools designed to automate repetitive or complex tasks - offer a solution to this challenge. While these frameworks provide benefits such as reducing manual labor and improving project efficiency, they have notable limitations, particularly in covering critical phases like business understanding and deployment. Additionally, training programs also struggle to fully address the competency gap due to time, cost and scalability constraints. This paper investigates how existing automation frameworks can fill these competency gaps within data science teams more effectively. Using the CRISP-DM model as an example of a structured process, this study first identifies tasks required in each phase. Then, it matches these tasks with relevant automation frameworks to assess the extent of automation possible. Finally, these tasks are mapped to the EDISON Data Science Competence Framework to highlight which competencies automation frameworks can address. The findings suggest that automation frameworks effectively bridge competency gaps, enabling teams to complete projects more efficiently and effectively where human expertise may be lacking. In this manner, our findings serve as a reference point for data scientists and practitioners alike.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825556
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empowering Data Science Teams: How Automation Frameworks Address Competency Gaps Across Project Lifecycles

Christian Beecks, Maike Holtkemper
2 citations
Big Data and Business Intelligence
1.06
article

Empowering Data Science Teams: How Automation Frameworks Address Competency Gaps Across Project Lifecycles

Christian Beecks, Maike Holtkemper
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In the fast-evolving field of data science, the combination of the right team competencies has a major impact on a successful project execution. These competencies, ranging from data acquisition to model deployment, are increasingly difficult to maintain due to widespread competency shortages. This puts data science projects at risk of delays, inefficiencies, and failure, as organizations struggle to find skilled professionals. Automation frameworks - software tools designed to automate repetitive or complex tasks - offer a solution to this challenge. While these frameworks provide benefits such as reducing manual labor and improving project efficiency, they have notable limitations, particularly in covering critical phases like business understanding and deployment. Additionally, training programs also struggle to fully address the competency gap due to time, cost and scalability constraints. This paper investigates how existing automation frameworks can fill these competency gaps within data science teams more effectively. Using the CRISP-DM model as an example of a structured process, this study first identifies tasks required in each phase. Then, it matches these tasks with relevant automation frameworks to assess the extent of automation possible. Finally, these tasks are mapped to the EDISON Data Science Competence Framework to highlight which competencies automation frameworks can address. The findings suggest that automation frameworks effectively bridge competency gaps, enabling teams to complete projects more efficiently and effectively where human expertise may be lacking. In this manner, our findings serve as a reference point for data scientists and practitioners alike.

FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Empowering Data Science Teams: How Automation Frameworks Address Competency Gaps Across Project Lifecycles — Christian Beecks, Maike Holtkemper · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS