Detecting Fake News Spreaders on Social Media Using Posts Content Versus Profile Information

The rapid spread of misinformation on social media platforms poses significant societal challenges, underscoring the need for effective methods to detect fake news spreaders. While many studies combine textual and user profile features for this task, the individual impact of these attributes remains unclear, raising questions about how each feature independently influences model performance. This study evaluates the effectiveness of textual data and user profile information in detecting fake news spreaders. By utilizing the Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) model on the TruthSeeker dataset, this study assesses the individual contribution of each feature and analyzes the effect of combining them on model accuracy. Additionally, the role of optimization techniques, such as L2 regularization and early stopping, in improving detection performance was investigated. The results indicate that textual data alone is highly effective (achieving an accuracy of 97.78%) in distinguishing between real and fake news, while the inclusion of user profile data (97.61%) does not significantly enhance model performance. Furthermore, models using only user profile data exhibited accuracy between 55% and 64%, highlighting the limited predictive power of this feature set alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825432
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Fake News Spreaders on Social Media Using Posts Content Versus Profile Information

Ifeoma Adaji, Linda O. Okpanachi
Spam and Phishing Detection
article

Detecting Fake News Spreaders on Social Media Using Posts Content Versus Profile Information

Ifeoma Adaji, Linda O. Okpanachi
article en

Abstract

The rapid spread of misinformation on social media platforms poses significant societal challenges, underscoring the need for effective methods to detect fake news spreaders. While many studies combine textual and user profile features for this task, the individual impact of these attributes remains unclear, raising questions about how each feature independently influences model performance. This study evaluates the effectiveness of textual data and user profile information in detecting fake news spreaders. By utilizing the Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) model on the TruthSeeker dataset, this study assesses the individual contribution of each feature and analyzes the effect of combining them on model accuracy. Additionally, the role of optimization techniques, such as L2 regularization and early stopping, in improving detection performance was investigated. The results indicate that textual data alone is highly effective (achieving an accuracy of 97.78%) in distinguishing between real and fake news, while the inclusion of user profile data (97.61%) does not significantly enhance model performance. Furthermore, models using only user profile data exhibited accuracy between 55% and 64%, highlighting the limited predictive power of this feature set alone.

University of British Columbia (CA), Okanagan University College (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Spam and Phishing Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Detecting Fake News Spreaders on Social Media Using Posts Content Versus Profile Information — Ifeoma Adaji, Linda O. Okpanachi · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS