Explainable Anomaly Detection: Counterfactual driven What-If Analysis

There exists three main areas of study inside of the field of predictive maintenance: anomaly detection, fault diagnosis, and remaining useful life prediction. Notably, anomaly detection alerts the stakeholder that an anomaly is occurring. This raises two fundamental questions: what is causing the fault and how can we fix it? Inside of the field of explainable artificial intelligence, counterfactual explanations can give that information in the form of what changes to make to put the data point into the opposing class, in this case "healthy." The suggestions are not always actionable which may raise the interest in asking "what if we do this instead?" In this work, we provide a proof of concept for utilizing counterfactual explanations as what-if analysis. We perform this on the PRONOSTIA dataset with a temporal convolutional network as the anomaly detector. Our method presents the counterfactuals in the form of a what-if analysis for this base problem to inspire future work for more complex systems and scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cogmi62246.2024.00028
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable Anomaly Detection: Counterfactual driven What-If Analysis

Shahram Rahimi, Maria Seale, Alexander Sommers, Joseph Jabour et al.
4 citations
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
1.39
article

Explainable Anomaly Detection: Counterfactual driven What-If Analysis

Shahram Rahimi, Maria Seale, Alexander Sommers, Joseph Jabour, Logan Cummins, Sudip Mittal, Thomas Arnold
article en
4 citations

Abstract

There exists three main areas of study inside of the field of predictive maintenance: anomaly detection, fault diagnosis, and remaining useful life prediction. Notably, anomaly detection alerts the stakeholder that an anomaly is occurring. This raises two fundamental questions: what is causing the fault and how can we fix it? Inside of the field of explainable artificial intelligence, counterfactual explanations can give that information in the form of what changes to make to put the data point into the opposing class, in this case "healthy." The suggestions are not always actionable which may raise the interest in asking "what if we do this instead?" In this work, we provide a proof of concept for utilizing counterfactual explanations as what-if analysis. We perform this on the PRONOSTIA dataset with a temporal convolutional network as the anomaly detector. Our method presents the counterfactuals in the form of a what-if analysis for this base problem to inspire future work for more complex systems and scenarios.

United States Department of Defense (US), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (US), Mississippi State University (US)
Arm
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.